pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bob Henkel <luckyratfoot@gmail.com>
To: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>
Cc: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: getting count for a specific querry
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 15:46:32 -0500
Message-ID: <762e5c050408134658d594fa@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1112992921.20921.84.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>
References: <003b01c53c70$6ff184b0$797ba8c0@jfradkin>
	<cb3b9f9319ae75a9f8eb756ff38e85e8@khera.org>
	<762e5c05040813354436bd27@mail.gmail.com>
	<1112992921.20921.84.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>

On Apr 8, 2005 3:42 PM, Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com> wrote: 
> 
> On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 15:35, Bob Henkel wrote:
> > On Apr 8, 2005 3:23 PM, Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org> wrote:
> > On Apr 8, 2005, at 3:23 PM, Joel Fradkin wrote:
> >
> > > I set up the data on 4 10k scsi drives in a powervault and
> > my wal on 2
> > > 15k
> > > drives. I am using links to those from the install
> > directory. It
> > > starts and
> > > stops ok this way, but maybe it should be different.
> > >
> >
> > Your problem might just be the choice of using a Dell RAID
> > controller.
> > I have a 1 year old box connected to a 14 disk powervault
> > (PowerEdge
> > 2650) and it is dog slow compared to a dual opteron with 8
> > disks that
> > is replacing it. It is all I/O for me, and the dell's just
> > are not
> > known for speedy I/O.
> >
> > Vivek Khera, Ph.D.
> > +1-301-869-4449 x806
> >
> >
> >
> > But that is relative I would think. Is the Dell RAID much faster than
> > my desktop SATA drive with no RAID? I'm by any means as knowledgeable
> > about I/O setup as many of you are but my 2 cents wonders if the Dell
> > RAID is really that much slower than a competitively priced/speced
> > alternative? Would Joel's problems just fade away if he wasn't using
> > a Dell RAID?
> 
> My experience with the 3i controllers (See my earlier post) was that my
> old Pentium Pro200x2 machine with 512 meg ram and a generic Ultra Wide
> SCSI card and a half dozen drives running software RAID 5 was faster.
> 
> Seriously. So was my P-II-350 desktop with the same controller, and an
> older Dual P-III-750 with only UltraSCSI running in a RAID-1 mirror set.
> 
> The 3I is REALLY slow (or at least WAS slow) under linux.
> 

Interesting... Maybe Joel after a weekend of rest can try it on a different 
setup even if that different setup is just a power users development machine 
to see if he has same or worse timing results. Be wonderful if it magically 
sped up.

view thread (38+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <762e5c050408134658d594fa@mail.gmail.com>
Permalink:  ../762e5c050408134658d594fa@mail.gmail.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/762e5c050408134658d594fa@mail.gmail.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: luckyratfoot@gmail.com, smarlowe@g2switchworks.com, vivek@khera.org
  Subject: Re: getting count for a specific querry
  In-Reply-To: <762e5c050408134658d594fa@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox