From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Dmitriy Igrishin <dmitigr@gmail.com>
Cc: postgres list <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: DROP RULE ... CASCADE
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:24:47 -0400
Message-ID: <8189.1268749487@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b4399d111003160239q2b48caf7j37822c2a428ab7fe@mail.gmail.com>
References: <b4399d111003160239q2b48caf7j37822c2a428ab7fe@mail.gmail.com>
Dmitriy Igrishin <dmitigr@gmail.com> writes:
> What objects may depend on the rule (and which of them will removed via
> cascade rule deletion)?
At present I don't think that a rule can have any dependent objects.
The CASCADE option is there for symmetry and future-proofing.
(The same goes for some other types of objects, too.)
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, dmitigr@gmail.com
Subject: Re: DROP RULE ... CASCADE
In-Reply-To: <8189.1268749487@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox