From: Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
To: Medi Montaseri <medi.montaseri@intransa.com>
Cc: Francisco Reyes <lists@natserv.com>
Cc: pgsql General List <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Closing inactive connections OR user connections limits
Date: 20 Nov 2002 16:33:15 -0500
Message-ID: <87wun83p0k.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DDBDBE5.6000505@intransa.com>
References: <20021120135345.S30106-100000@zoraida.natserv.net>
<3DDBDBE5.6000505@intransa.com>
Medi Montaseri <medi.montaseri@intransa.com> writes:
> I think from the data integrity point of view, vacuum is more
> important than vacuum full.
Why would VACUUM have any effect on data integrity, either positive or
negative?
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: neilc@samurai.com, medi.montaseri@intransa.com, lists@natserv.com, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Closing inactive connections OR user connections limits
In-Reply-To: <87wun83p0k.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox