pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: Richard Sydney-Smith <richard@ibisaustralia.com>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Mystery function error
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:06:22 -0400
Message-ID: <9398.1064765182@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200309272229.50601.josh@agliodbs.com>
References: <000c01c38572$73c03c50$251a32d2@athlon2000>
	<200309272229.50601.josh@agliodbs.com>

Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> Also, this will run faster if you do it as a SQL function:

> CREATE FUNCTION locate ( text, text ) RETURNS INT AS '
> SELECT POSITION($2, $1);
> ' LANGUAGE SQL IMMUTABLE STRICT;

This is definitely the solution I'd recommend for 7.4 (because 7.4 would
inline the SQL function definition, resulting in zero runtime overhead).
In 7.3 I suspect the plpgsql version might be a tad faster, or anyway
comparable.  Has anyone done any head-to-head performance comparisons
on such simple functions?

			regards, tom lane



view thread (10+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <9398.1064765182@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../9398.1064765182@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/9398.1064765182@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, josh@agliodbs.com, richard@ibisaustralia.com
  Subject: Re: Mystery function error
  In-Reply-To: <9398.1064765182@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox