From: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org>
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Question on triggers and plpgsql
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:02:51 -0400
Message-ID: <986acdb4ff3bdac82c5e09c607bc7839@khera.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050408145928.GA27718@phlogiston.dyndns.org>
References: <4255AA15.8000508@mochima.com>
<BE1E8DAA-A829-11D9-9125-000A95B03262@pgedit.com>
<fef7e50cf33b53ca481ecb2554cd6403@mail.nih.gov>
<14244.1112970986@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<20050408145928.GA27718@phlogiston.dyndns.org>
On Apr 8, 2005, at 10:59 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> wakes up the mail-sender client with the NOTIFY; the NOTIFY and the
> commit to the mail-it table only happen in that case if the
> transaction commits. And since mail is async anyway, the extra few
> seconds shouldn't make any difference, right?
>
I have a lot of processing that could benefit from this type of
synchronization, except the fact that there's no Pg command to "wait
until I get a notify message". You have to constantly poll to see if
you got one, which negates a lot of the benefit of async notification
to rarely run processes.
Vivek Khera, Ph.D.
+1-301-869-4449 x806
Attachments:
smime.p7s (application/pkcs7-signature, 2.4K) download
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: vivek@khera.org
Subject: Re: Question on triggers and plpgsql
In-Reply-To: <986acdb4ff3bdac82c5e09c607bc7839@khera.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox