From: Charlie <scorpdaddy@hotmail.com>
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>
Subject: Schema partitioning
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 15:13:26 -0300
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP160E0FDF5187168D1BA6EC2CE190@phx.gbl> (raw)
Could I get feedback from the community on schema partitioning?
I'm doing maintenance on my ddl and I'm noticing that my tables are all in 1 schema, but they have prefixes on their names like table_app1_sometable, table_app1_secondtable, table_app2_anothertable, table_priviledged_restrictedtable1, etc. The table_app1 tables seem to want to go in their own schema "app1", etc, and drop the prefixes. Except they'll still be there, as in app1.sometable.
Is this just style? Or are there concrete benefits to partitioning?
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: scorpdaddy@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: Schema partitioning
In-Reply-To: <BLU0-SMTP160E0FDF5187168D1BA6EC2CE190@phx.gbl>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox