From: Passynkov, Vadim <Vadim.Passynkov@pathcom.com>
To: 'Jeff Eckermann' <jeff_eckermann@yahoo.com>
To: Thomas Swan <tswan@idigx.com>
To: olly@lfix.co.uk
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: Theo Galanakis <Theo.Galanakis@lonelyplanet.com.au>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Isnumeric function?
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 11:01:38 -0400
Message-ID: <C8C8E7457059D5119E4700D0B765DCB8016AA8D1@sinope.inside.pathcom.com> (raw)
How about this
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION is_numeric ( text ) RETURNS bool AS '
if { [string is integer $1] || [string is double $1] } {
return true
}
return false
' LANGUAGE 'pltcl' IMMUTABLE;
SELECT is_numeric ( '-1' );
is_numeric
------------
t
(1 row)
SELECT is_numeric ( '+1e-1' );
is_numeric
------------
t
(1 row)
SELECT is_numeric ( '1.1.1' );
is_numeric
------------
f
(1 row)
--
Vadim Passynkov
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Eckermann [mailto:jeff_eckermann@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 10:02 AM
To: Thomas Swan; olly@lfix.co.uk
Cc: Josh Berkus; Theo Galanakis; pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [SQL] Isnumeric function?
Ok, how about this. At least it works in my testing.
I have extended it to allow a negative sign (trailing
also), which I would expect to be allowed in a
comprehensive "isnumeric" function. If I am wrong,
feel free to slap me around; although correcting the
regex would be more constructive. ;-)
create function isnumeric(text) returns boolean as '
select $1 ~
\'(-?([0-9]+\\.?[0-9]*|[0-9]*\\.?[0-9]+)|([0-9]+\\.?[0-9]*|[0-9]*\\.?[0-9]+)
-?)\'
'language 'sql';
--- Thomas Swan <tswan@idigx.com> wrote:
> Oliver Elphick wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 18:48, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Theo, Oliver,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Any reason why you don't like ~
> '^([0-9]?)+\.?[0-9]*$' ?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Yes, because it also matches "." , which is not a
> valid numeric value.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> ~ '^([0-9]+|[0-9]+\\.[0-9]*|[0-9]*\\.[0-9]+)$'
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Ah, the brute force approach ;-)
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Nothing like using a nice big hammer!
> >
> >
> >
> Would "^([0-9]+\\.{0,1}[0-9]*|\\.[0-9]+)$" be a
> little cleaner?
>
> >>Actually, the above could be written:
> >>
> >>~ '^([0-9]+)|([0-9]*\\.[0-9]+)$'
> >>
> >>
> >
> >But that doesn't allow a trailing decimal point.
> >
> >
> >
> >>... though that still seems inelegant to me. Is
> there a regex expert in the
> >>house?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >All the elegant approaches I can think of match the
> empty string. There
> >must be at least one digit and 0 or 1 decimal point
> with no other
> >characters permitted. If you use this as a
> constraint, you could make
> >it elegant and combine it with another constraint
> to exclude '' and '.'.
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: Vadim.Passynkov@pathcom.com, jeff_eckermann@yahoo.com, tswan@idigx.com, olly@lfix.co.uk, josh@agliodbs.com, Theo.Galanakis@lonelyplanet.com.au
Subject: Re: Isnumeric function?
In-Reply-To: <C8C8E7457059D5119E4700D0B765DCB8016AA8D1@sinope.inside.pathcom.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox