pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: scott.marlowe <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>
To: Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Thomas O'Connell <tfo@monsterlabs.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Bug with sequence
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 14:52:18 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0211211450100.23804-100000@css120.ihs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1037910229.56165.20.camel@jester>

On 21 Nov 2002, Rod Taylor wrote:

> On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 15:09, scott.marlowe wrote:
> > On 21 Nov 2002, Rod Taylor wrote:
> > 
> > > On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 14:11, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > Of course, those would be SQL purists who _don't_ understand
> > > > concurrency issues.  ;-)
> > > 
> > > Or they're the kind that locks the entire table for any given insert.
> > 
> > Isn't that what Bruce just said?  ;^)
> 
> I suppose so.  I took what Bruce said to be that multiple users could
> get the same ID.
> 
> I keep having developers want to make their own table for a sequence,
> then use id = id + 1 -- so they hold a lock on it for the duration of
> the transaction.

I was just funnin' with ya, but the point behind it was that either way 
(with or without a lock) that using something other than a sequence is  
probably a bad idea.  Either way, under parallel load, you have data 
consistency issues, or you have poor performance issues.




view thread (19+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0211211450100.23804-100000@css120.ihs.com>
Permalink:  ../Pine.LNX.4.33.0211211450100.23804-100000@css120.ihs.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/Pine.LNX.4.33.0211211450100.23804-100000@css120.ihs.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: scott.marlowe@ihs.com, rbt@rbt.ca, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, tfo@monsterlabs.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Bug with sequence
  In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0211211450100.23804-100000@css120.ihs.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox