pg.ddx.io pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feed From: Michael Glaesemann <grzm@myrealbox.com>
To: pginfo <pginfo@t1.unisoftbg.com>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pg primary key bug?
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 23:14:45 +0900
Message-ID: <a284e85c43ed7f8afc4330068e42ac2f@myrealbox.com> (raw )
In-Reply-To: <42021EAD.90104@t1.unisoftbg.com >
References: <42021EAD.90104@t1.unisoftbg.com >
On Feb 3, 2005, at 21:53, pginfo wrote:
> I am using pg 7.4.5 on RedHat AS 3.0.
> sklad21=# \d a_constants_str
> Table "public.a_constants_str"
> Column | Type | Modifiers
> ------------+-----------------------+-----------
> constname | character varying(30) | not null
> fid | integer | not null
> constvalue | character varying(30) |
> Indexes:
> "a_constants_str_pkey" primary key, btree (constname, fid)
>
> sklad21=# select * from a_constants_str ;
> constname | fid | constvalue -----------+-----+-------------
> AACCGRID | 0 | SOF_3
> AKLTYPID | 0 | SOF_3
> ADARID | 0 | SOF_2
> AOBLASTID | 0 | SOF_6
> AUSERID | 0 | SOF_17
> ANMGRID | 0 | SOF_21
> LOCAID | 0 | SOF_41
> DOCID | 0 | SOF_1585254
> DOCPLAID | 0 | SOF_1052900
> AKLIID | 0 | SOF_18740
> DOCRID | 0 | SOF_2268142
> DOCPOGPLA | 0 | SOF_324586
> DOCID | 0 | SOF_1585254
> DOCID | 0 | SOF_1585254
> DOCID | 0 | SOF_1585254
> AKLGRID | 0 | SOF_45
> DOCID | 0 | SOF_1585254
> DOCID | 0 | SOF_1585254
> ASETUPID | 0 | SOF_4605
> DOCID | 0 | SOF_1585254
> DOCID | 0 | SOF_1585254
> TDOCID | 0 | SOF_337
> TDOCRID | 0 | SOF_19450
> DOCID | 0 | SOF_1585254
> DOCID | 0 | SOF_1585254
> AGRADID | 0 | SOF_256
> DOCID | 0 | SOF_1585254
> ASLUID | 0 | SOF_46
> NASTRF | 0 | SOF_88
> ANOMID | 0 | SOF_1200
> (30 rows)
>
>
> Pls., see the records with 'DOCID' and note we have primary key
> defined.
It's unclear from just this data, but there's a chance that there are
varying numbers of spaces after 'DOCID', which would appear as separate
values for the index, even though they aren't readily apparent. Could
you show us the results of the following query?
select constname, length(constname) as constname_length
from a_constants_str;
Here's another one which would show if PostgreSQL is treating them
equally:
select constname, count(constname)
from a_constants_str;
The results of these queries might shed some light on the issue.
Hope this helps.
Michael Glaesemann
grzm myrealbox com
view thread (27+ messages) latest in thread
Message-ID: <a284e85c43ed7f8afc4330068e42ac2f@myrealbox.com>
Permalink: ../a284e85c43ed7f8afc4330068e42ac2f@myrealbox.com/
Also on: postgresql.org/message-id/a284e85c43ed7f8afc4330068e42ac2f@myrealbox.com
copy link · copy postgr.es
reply Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: grzm@myrealbox.com, pginfo@t1.unisoftbg.com
Subject: Re: pg primary key bug?
In-Reply-To: <a284e85c43ed7f8afc4330068e42ac2f@myrealbox.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox