From: Stefan Arentz <stefan.arentz@gmail.com>
To: Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer@spamfence.net>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Counting all rows
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 15:15:22 +0200
Message-ID: <adf34c300706230615j4763748dn9e1dae2cb5c2524c@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070623103856.GE7307@KanotixBox>
References: <adf34c300706230315y43ba92daqf0804b7c377ffd29@mail.gmail.com>
<20070623103856.GE7307@KanotixBox>
On 6/23/07, Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer@spamfence.net> wrote:
> Stefan Arentz <stefan.arentz@gmail.com> schrieb:
>
> > I need to get statistics from a bunch of tables. Simply the number of
> > records in them.
> >
> > The query plan looks like this:
> >
> > => explain select count(id) from stuff;
> > QUERY PLAN
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Aggregate (cost=1629.69..1629.70 rows=1 width=8)
> > -> Seq Scan on stuff (cost=0.00..1517.75 rows=44775 width=8)
> >
> > The sequential scan kind of worries me. Is there a better/faster way to do
> > this?
>
> Yes.
>
> A "select count(*) from foo;" enforces a seq. scan. Solutions for this
> are discussed here: http://www.varlena.com/GeneralBits/120.php
Thank you Andreas. That is exactly what I was looking for.
S.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: stefan.arentz@gmail.com, akretschmer@spamfence.net
Subject: Re: Counting all rows
In-Reply-To: <adf34c300706230615j4763748dn9e1dae2cb5c2524c@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox