pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Rylander <mrylander@gmail.com>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Mislabeled timestamp functions (was Re: [SQL] [NOVICE] date_trunc'd timestamp index possible?)
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 10:49:12 -0400
Message-ID: <b918cf3d04100307495428fe3e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22070.1096741370@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <web-1583353@davinci.ethosmedia.com>
	<13492.1096656574@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<15677.1096671183@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<200410021941.30084.peter_e@gmx.net>
	<22070.1096741370@sss.pgh.pa.us>

Not that my 2c is worth 1c, but I second this.  I'd rather initdb now
than get bitten by some catalog difference when I move my DB into
production. :)

--miker

On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 14:22:50 -0400, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
[...]
> 
> > I'd prefer if all users of 8.0 were guaranteed to have the same catalog.
> 
> Well, there's something to be said for that viewpoint too.  Anyone else
> feel the same?
[...]



view thread (11+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <b918cf3d04100307495428fe3e@mail.gmail.com>
Permalink:  ../b918cf3d04100307495428fe3e@mail.gmail.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/b918cf3d04100307495428fe3e@mail.gmail.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: mrylander@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: Mislabeled timestamp functions (was Re: [SQL] [NOVICE] date_trunc'd timestamp index possible?)
  In-Reply-To: <b918cf3d04100307495428fe3e@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox