pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aaron Bono <postgresql@aranya.com>
To: Jim Nasby <jimn@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: gdavis@refractions.net
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] timestamp subtraction (was Re: formatting intervals with to_char)
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 14:57:28 -0500
Message-ID: <bf05e51c0610091257m8bb5e02r9491dac16e290a2c@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DB91DDA2-F0F2-42CF-B5E8-A481E622F1CD@enterprisedb.com>
References: <4522EC42.1080500@refractions.net>
	<21619.1160067054@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<DB91DDA2-F0F2-42CF-B5E8-A481E622F1CD@enterprisedb.com>

On 10/5/06, Jim Nasby <jimn@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> On Oct 5, 2006, at 11:50 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > regression=# select ('2006-09-15 23:59:00'::timestamp - '2006-09-01
> > 09:30:41'::timestamp);
> >      ?column?
> > ------------------
> >  14 days 14:28:19
> > (1 row)
> >
> > should be reporting '350:28:19' instead.
> >
> > This is a hack that was done to minimize the changes in the regression
> > test expected outputs when we changed type interval from months/
> > seconds
> > to months/days/seconds.  But I wonder whether it wasn't a dumb idea.
> > It is certainly inconsistent, as noted in the code comments.
> >
> > I'm tempted to propose that we remove the justify_hours call, and tell
> > anyone who really wants the old results to apply justify_hours() to
> > the
> > subtraction result for themselves.  Not sure what the fallout would
> > be,
> > though.
>
> I suspect there's applications out there that are relying on that
> being nicely formated for display purposes.
>
> I agree it should be removed, but we might need a form of backwards
> compatibility for a version or two...



I am personally of the opinion that display logic should never be put into
the database.  Applications that rely on the database formatting - that is
tightly coupling your application to the database which does not follow good
programming principles.

None-the-less, the feature would be nice and may be very valuable for
reporting.

==================================================================
   Aaron Bono
   Aranya Software Technologies, Inc.
   http://www.aranya.com
   http://codeelixir.com
==================================================================

view thread (11+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <bf05e51c0610091257m8bb5e02r9491dac16e290a2c@mail.gmail.com>
Permalink:  ../bf05e51c0610091257m8bb5e02r9491dac16e290a2c@mail.gmail.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/bf05e51c0610091257m8bb5e02r9491dac16e290a2c@mail.gmail.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: postgresql@aranya.com, jimn@enterprisedb.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, gdavis@refractions.net, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: [HACKERS] timestamp subtraction (was Re: formatting intervals with to_char)
  In-Reply-To: <bf05e51c0610091257m8bb5e02r9491dac16e290a2c@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox