From: Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
To: msi77 <msi77@yandex.ru>
Cc: Gary Chambers <gwchamb@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: 8.4.1 distinct query WITHOUT order by
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 02:22:36 -0700
Message-ID: <dcc563d10912220122y1d67ae2oa5f5b5c48f1319c1@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10421261465901@webmail111.yandex.ru>
References: <302670f20912211415n4fc73b04x19eebfb9ff0acd60@mail.gmail.com>
<10421261465901@webmail111.yandex.ru>
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:11 AM, msi77 <msi77@yandex.ru> wrote:
>> What are the ramifications of renaming the table (containing 8000
>> rows) and creating a view of the same name?
>
> View does not admit ORDER BY clause, at least, Standard does not.
Postgres certainly allows it, but I don't think it will help in this case.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: scott.marlowe@gmail.com, msi77@yandex.ru, gwchamb@gmail.com
Subject: Re: 8.4.1 distinct query WITHOUT order by
In-Reply-To: <dcc563d10912220122y1d67ae2oa5f5b5c48f1319c1@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox