From: Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Common table expression - parsing questions
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2009 08:10:52 +0200
Message-ID: <ha9e9c$p9v$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22431f1b0909281954t21cffc94o291002fe6b545494@mail.gmail.com>
References: <22431f1b0909281954t21cffc94o291002fe6b545494@mail.gmail.com>
the6campbells wrote on 29.09.2009 04:54:
> 2. Do you intend to remove the requirement to include the recursive
> keyword - as other vendors allow
The standard *requires* the keyword.
As far as I can tell there are two DBMS that require it (Postgres, Firebird) and two that don't (SQL Server and Oracle with the newest release)
Thomas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: spam_eater@gmx.net
Subject: Re: Common table expression - parsing questions
In-Reply-To: <ha9e9c$p9v$1@ger.gmane.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox