pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Herouth Maoz <herouth@oumail.openu.ac.il>
To: jwieck@debis.com
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: [SQL] Order by
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 17:06:53 +0300
Message-ID: <l03130304b37add804973@[147.233.159.109]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m10p8Wq-0003kGC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de>
References: <l03130302b37aaa3d3da3@[147.233.159.109]>

At 13:45 +0300 on 02/06/1999, Jan Wieck wrote:


>     That's all right and I'm not going to allow this just for the
>     ORDER BY.  It will be enabled  as  kind  of  a  side  effect.
>     Because   view's   can   have   a   GROUP   BY   clause,  the
>     rewriter/planner  must  be  able  to  produce   plans   where
>     different  left-/righttrees have their own grouping. Grouping
>     requires  a  sort  and  thus  sorting  of  subplans  must  be
>     supported.
>
>     Why should we deny ORDER BY on views explicitly?

The SQL92 standard, if I read it right, defines the view by a "query
expression", which in its turn relies on "query specification", which in
turn relies on "table expression", which does not include ORDER BY.

In short, ORDER BY is not part of the query syntax used in the definition
of views, because order is meaningless in views.

The basic idea is that we should get the same results if we use standard
SQL whether we run on PostgreSQL or on Oracle. So, one may write an
application which selects the data from the view, and relies on the order
in the view for something (like grouping). The same program won't work in
any other database system, because you simply can't make that assumption
without adding 'ORDER BY' to your actual query.

Herouth

--
Herouth Maoz, Internet developer.
Open University of Israel - Telem project
http://telem.openu.ac.il/~herutma





view thread (18+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <l03130304b37add804973@[147.233.159.109]>
Permalink:  ../l03130304b37add804973@%5B147.233.159.109%5D/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/l03130304b37add804973@[147.233.159.109]

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: herouth@oumail.openu.ac.il, jwieck@debis.com
  Subject: Re: [SQL] Order by
  In-Reply-To: <l03130304b37add804973@[147.233.159.109]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox