From: Roland Roberts <roland@astrofoto.org>
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [SQL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
Date: 24 Sep 2002 10:55:41 -0400
Message-ID: <m2fzvzv3ma.fsf@kuiper.rlent.pnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020924011912.GA16430@svana.org>
References: <21724.1032793386@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<200209231506.g8NF6JP13779@candle.pha.pa.us>
<0meuousc373fdokv3bbke116jsbkpakno2@4ax.com>
<22827.1032800742@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<kgmuouku2imliobrrck45ugkc0hlrkbo1v@4ax.com>
<20020924011912.GA16430@svana.org>
>>>>> "Martijn" == Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes:
Martijn> Well, what I would suggest is that when you wrap several
Martijn> statements into a single transaction with begin/commit,
Martijn> the whole lot could be considered a single statement
Martijn> (since they form an atomic transaction so in a sense they
Martijn> are all executed simultaneously). And hence Postgresql is
Martijn> perfectly compliant.
FWIW, and not that I am an Oracle fan :-), Oracle seems to interpret
this the same way when using a "select sysdate from dual" inside a
transaction.
roland
--
PGP Key ID: 66 BC 3B CD
Roland B. Roberts, PhD RL Enterprises
roland@rlenter.com 76-15 113th Street, Apt 3B
roland@astrofoto.org Forest Hills, NY 11375
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: roland@astrofoto.org, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [SQL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
In-Reply-To: <m2fzvzv3ma.fsf@kuiper.rlent.pnet>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox