From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: John Proctor <jproctor@prium.net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [SQL] 16 parameter limit
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 20:25:20 -0700
Message-ID: <web-1371946@davinci.ethosmedia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200204160258.g3G2wpG01075@candle.pha.pa.us>
Bruce,
> The following patch adds --maxindfuncparams to configure to allow you
> to
> more easily set the maximum number of function parameters and columns
> in an index. (Can someone come up with a better name?)
How about simply --max_params ?
> Are we staying at 16 as the default? I personally think we can
> increase it to 32 with little penalty,
I'd vote for that. But then, you knew that. John Proctor wants 128.
>and that we should increase
> NAMEDATALEN to 64.
I don't even know that is.
-Josh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: josh@agliodbs.com, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, jproctor@prium.net, pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [SQL] 16 parameter limit
In-Reply-To: <web-1371946@davinci.ethosmedia.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox