From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Luis Sousa <llsousa@ualg.pt>
Cc: pgsql-sql <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Permission on insert rules
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 09:59:56 -0800
Message-ID: <web-1821190@davinci.ethosmedia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1037033140.26585.34.camel@camel>
Robert,
> If the functions can fire as there creator instead of there caller,
> then
> I would think as long as the creator has insert/update views on the
> base
> table, you should be able to do updateable rules and give only
> permissions to the view for the caller. (Though maybe you have to use
> triggers rather than rules to do this?) Does that sound right?
I don't know. Can you test it?
-Josh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: josh@agliodbs.com, xzilla@users.sourceforge.net, llsousa@ualg.pt
Subject: Re: Permission on insert rules
In-Reply-To: <web-1821190@davinci.ethosmedia.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox