public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Getting better Google search results
7+ messages / 6 participants
[nested] [flat]

* Getting better Google search results
@ 2006-08-29 04:20 Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
  2006-08-29 07:56 ` Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Getting better Google search results Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
  2006-09-04 05:30 ` Re: Getting better Google search results Dawid Kuroczko <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread

From: Greg Sabino Mullane @ 2006-08-29 04:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: [email protected]


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


I had an idea while discussing the limitations of our searching
on irc with a few folks. As far as Google putting old 7.x and
6.x documentation results up, why not create a new subdomain
such as oldocs.postgres.org and stick anything older than a
version of two there. We could still link to it, and leave some
redirects in place for old links, but the new subdomain would
ensure that they would have relatively *low* Google results
compared to the more recent docs, which is what we want.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane [email protected]
End Point Corporation
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200608290016
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFE87/LvJuQZxSWSsgRAk/0AJ9k3fokCQEj7aVyuNBnJF8vCrEDzACcDR8K
ZVDwn7UHGIvZUHUcCyV62a4=
=VwOO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Getting better Google search results
  2006-08-29 04:20 Getting better Google search results Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
@ 2006-08-29 07:56 ` Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
  2006-08-29 10:37   ` Re: Getting better Google search results Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
  2006-08-29 14:20   ` Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Getting better Google search Devrim GUNDUZ <[email protected]>
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread

From: Magnus Hagander @ 2006-08-29 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>; [email protected]; +Cc: pgsql-www

Wouldn't this be better on -www? :-P


> I had an idea while discussing the limitations of our searching on
> irc with a few folks. As far as Google putting old 7.x and 6.x
> documentation results up, why not create a new subdomain such as
> oldocs.postgres.org and stick anything older than a version of two
> there. We could still link to it, and leave some redirects in place
> for old links, but the new subdomain would ensure that they would
> have relatively *low* Google results compared to the more recent
> docs, which is what we want.

Don't we have enough silly domains already? If we want to get rid of
those hits, why don't we just add a robots.txt and tell google not to
index the old docs at all? (If people *need* hits in the old docs, they
can always hit our own search engine for those docs)

//Magnus




^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: Getting better Google search results
  2006-08-29 04:20 Getting better Google search results Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
  2006-08-29 07:56 ` Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Getting better Google search results Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
@ 2006-08-29 10:37   ` Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread

From: Greg Sabino Mullane @ 2006-08-29 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: [email protected]


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


> Wouldn't this be better on -www? :-P

I considered that, but this seems more of an advocacy problem
with a technical solution. I thought the wider advocacy audience
might have some ideas about it.

> Don't we have enough silly domains already? If we want to get rid of
> those hits, why don't we just add a robots.txt and tell google not to
> index the old docs at all? (If people *need* hits in the old docs, they
> can always hit our own search engine for those docs)

I considered that, but I would not want to completely eliminate the
old docs from Google searching. There's always a chance something useful is
there. However, since 99.9% of generic non-version specific searches should
*not* hit those pages, it's best to stick those on the "e" in
Goooooooooooooooooooooooogle. :)

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane [email protected]
End Point Corporation
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200608290634
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFE9BhTvJuQZxSWSsgRAjMuAJ9eHXUVE1teHRNVMuH7lKOKxIgG6wCffYak
S9CKiT3zI/FitV09LeAKPHs=
=CwM6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Getting better Google search
  2006-08-29 04:20 Getting better Google search results Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
  2006-08-29 07:56 ` Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Getting better Google search results Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
@ 2006-08-29 14:20   ` Devrim GUNDUZ <[email protected]>
  2006-08-29 15:07     ` Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Getting better Google search Robert Treat <[email protected]>
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread

From: Devrim GUNDUZ @ 2006-08-29 14:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>; +Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>; [email protected]; pgsql-www

Hello,

On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 09:56 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:

> Don't we have enough silly domains already? 

Heh.

olddocs.postgresql.org
veryolddocs.postgresql.org
atticdocs.postgresq
rarelyuseddocs.postgresql.org

...
:)
-- 
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/



Attachments:

  [application/pgp-signature] signature.asc (189B, 2-signature.asc)
  download

^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Getting better Google search
  2006-08-29 04:20 Getting better Google search results Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
  2006-08-29 07:56 ` Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Getting better Google search results Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
  2006-08-29 14:20   ` Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Getting better Google search Devrim GUNDUZ <[email protected]>
@ 2006-08-29 15:07     ` Robert Treat <[email protected]>
  2006-08-29 16:11       ` Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Getting better Google search Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread

From: Robert Treat @ 2006-08-29 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: [email protected]; +Cc: Devrim GUNDUZ <[email protected]>; Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>; Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>; pgsql-www

On Tuesday 29 August 2006 10:20, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 09:56 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Don't we have enough silly domains already?
>
> Heh.
>
> olddocs.postgresql.org
> veryolddocs.postgresql.org
> atticdocs.postgresq
> rarelyuseddocs.postgresql.org
>

ifyouarestillrunningthisversionthedocswonthelpyou.postgresql.org

-- 
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Getting better Google search
  2006-08-29 04:20 Getting better Google search results Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
  2006-08-29 07:56 ` Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Getting better Google search results Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
  2006-08-29 14:20   ` Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Getting better Google search Devrim GUNDUZ <[email protected]>
  2006-08-29 15:07     ` Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Getting better Google search Robert Treat <[email protected]>
@ 2006-08-29 16:11       ` Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread

From: Joshua D. Drake @ 2006-08-29 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Robert Treat <[email protected]>; +Cc: [email protected]; Devrim GUNDUZ <[email protected]>; Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>; Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>; pgsql-www

Robert Treat wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 August 2006 10:20, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 09:56 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> Don't we have enough silly domains already?
>> Heh.
>>
>> olddocs.postgresql.org
>> veryolddocs.postgresql.org
>> atticdocs.postgresq
>> rarelyuseddocs.postgresql.org
>>
> 
> ifyouarestillrunningthisversionthedocswonthelpyou.postgresql.org

Let's just shorten that to:

youarefscked.postgresql.org

Joshua D. Drake




-- 

    === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
    Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
              http://www.commandprompt.com/





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: Getting better Google search results
  2006-08-29 04:20 Getting better Google search results Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
@ 2006-09-04 05:30 ` Dawid Kuroczko <[email protected]>
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread

From: Dawid Kuroczko @ 2006-09-04 05:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>; +Cc: [email protected]

On 8/29/06, Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]> wrote:
> I had an idea while discussing the limitations of our searching
> on irc with a few folks. As far as Google putting old 7.x and
> 6.x documentation results up, why not create a new subdomain
> such as oldocs.postgres.org and stick anything older than a
> version of two there. We could still link to it, and leave some
> redirects in place for old links, but the new subdomain would
> ensure that they would have relatively *low* Google results
> compared to the more recent docs, which is what we want.

Wouldn't it be feasible to add a "see current version" link
which would link from all the old versions to the most current
one?  Say, a page
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/static/ecpg-errors.html
...would have a line in a header:
Home → Documentation → Manuals → PostgreSQL 7.4 (See current version)
...where (See current version) would link to:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/ecpg-errors.html

As far as I understand how Google works, this would push
the link density towards the current version of PostgreSQL,
therefore 8.1 should pop out as top results.

Just a thought. :)

   Regards,
      Dawid




^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 7+ messages in thread


end of thread, other threads:[~2006-09-04 05:30 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-08-29 04:20 Getting better Google search results Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
2006-08-29 07:56 ` Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
2006-08-29 10:37   ` Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
2006-08-29 14:20   ` Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Getting better Google search Devrim GUNDUZ <[email protected]>
2006-08-29 15:07     ` Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Getting better Google search Robert Treat <[email protected]>
2006-08-29 16:11       ` Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Getting better Google search Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
2006-09-04 05:30 ` Dawid Kuroczko <[email protected]>

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox