public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedWhy is April 21 listed twice in the pgsql-general web archive?
4+ messages / 4 participants
[nested] [flat]
* Why is April 21 listed twice in the pgsql-general web archive?
@ 2006-04-21 15:00 Jeff Amiel <[email protected]>
2006-05-28 13:45 ` Re: Why is April 21 listed twice in the pgsql-general web archive? Robert Treat <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Amiel @ 2006-04-21 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-www
Why is April 21 listed twice in the pgsql-general web archive?
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2006-04/index.php
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Why is April 21 listed twice in the pgsql-general web archive?
2006-04-21 15:00 Why is April 21 listed twice in the pgsql-general web archive? Jeff Amiel <[email protected]>
@ 2006-05-28 13:45 ` Robert Treat <[email protected]>
2006-05-28 16:12 ` Re: Why is April 21 listed twice in the pgsql-general web archive? Tom Lane <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Robert Treat @ 2006-05-28 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-www; +Cc: Jeff Amiel <[email protected]>
On Friday 21 April 2006 11:00, Jeff Amiel wrote:
> Why is April 21 listed twice in the pgsql-general web archive?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2006-04/index.php
>
looks like there is a glitch with whichever date shows up at the top of a
given page. If you browse through the month of april, you'll see this happens
on a number of different days always appearing at the top of each page.
Dave/Marc... any thoughts?
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Why is April 21 listed twice in the pgsql-general web archive?
2006-04-21 15:00 Why is April 21 listed twice in the pgsql-general web archive? Jeff Amiel <[email protected]>
2006-05-28 13:45 ` Re: Why is April 21 listed twice in the pgsql-general web archive? Robert Treat <[email protected]>
@ 2006-05-28 16:12 ` Tom Lane <[email protected]>
2006-05-28 16:20 ` Re: Why is April 21 listed twice in the pgsql-general web archive? Michael Fuhr <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tom Lane @ 2006-05-28 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Treat <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-www; Jeff Amiel <[email protected]>
Robert Treat <[email protected]> writes:
> looks like there is a glitch with whichever date shows up at the top of a
> given page. If you browse through the month of april, you'll see this happens
> on a number of different days always appearing at the top of each page.
The other problem that the archive pages have had since forever is the
tendency to show a few garbage "[no subject]" entries near the top of
the newest page for a list. These always point to what seem to be
partial messages. I do not know if this represents the archiving
process storing bad data, or the web page generator misinterpreting
what's stored.
regards, tom lane
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Why is April 21 listed twice in the pgsql-general web archive?
2006-04-21 15:00 Why is April 21 listed twice in the pgsql-general web archive? Jeff Amiel <[email protected]>
2006-05-28 13:45 ` Re: Why is April 21 listed twice in the pgsql-general web archive? Robert Treat <[email protected]>
2006-05-28 16:12 ` Re: Why is April 21 listed twice in the pgsql-general web archive? Tom Lane <[email protected]>
@ 2006-05-28 16:20 ` Michael Fuhr <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michael Fuhr @ 2006-05-28 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Lane <[email protected]>; +Cc: Robert Treat <[email protected]>; pgsql-www; Jeff Amiel <[email protected]>
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 12:12:10PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> The other problem that the archive pages have had since forever is the
> tendency to show a few garbage "[no subject]" entries near the top of
> the newest page for a list. These always point to what seem to be
> partial messages. I do not know if this represents the archiving
> process storing bad data, or the web page generator misinterpreting
> what's stored.
I investigated this several months ago and suggested a possible
cause: that a paragraph beginning with "From " is being parsed as
the beginning of a new message.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-www/2006-02/msg00083.php
--
Michael Fuhr
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-05-28 16:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-04-21 15:00 Why is April 21 listed twice in the pgsql-general web archive? Jeff Amiel <[email protected]>
2006-05-28 13:45 ` Robert Treat <[email protected]>
2006-05-28 16:12 ` Tom Lane <[email protected]>
2006-05-28 16:20 ` Michael Fuhr <[email protected]>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox