public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Dave Page <[email protected]>
To: Kris Jurka <[email protected]>
Cc: Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
Cc: Chander Ganesan <[email protected]>
Cc: Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
Cc: Kevin Hunter <[email protected]>
Cc: Postgres WWW List <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Training events policy ... first test case
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 19:51:03 -0000
Message-ID: <200711041951040000@204315953> (raw)
> ------- Original Message -------
> From: Kris Jurka <[email protected]>
> To: Dave Page <[email protected]>
> Sent: 04/11/07, 19:28:54
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Training events policy ... first test case
>
>
> On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Dave Page wrote:
>
> >> ------- Original Message -------
> >> From: "Joshua D. Drake" <[email protected]>
> >> To: Chander Ganesan <[email protected]>
> >> Sent: 04/11/07, 17:39:21
> >> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Training events policy ... first test case
> >>
> >> However I do see a flood of entries later from Certfirst. Not to be an
> >> ass, but this problem goes away for the forseeable future if we just
> >> ban Certfirst from posting training events. There is no way they are
> >> running all those classes.
> >
> > Any talk along those lines should not be held in this public forum.
> >
>
> I don't see why not. This whole thread has been full of vague, "some
> companies" are doing bad things. If there are bad apples out there, let's
> expose them. While it may not be appropriate to speak for the community
> yet, I don't see why individuals naming names is a bad thing. It focuses
> the actual discussion back to reality and let's people in the know have
> some useful information when discussing or considering training.
>
> Your suggestion implies that instead of doing this publicly a www team
> cabal should decide this in some back room and not inform anyone of it.
>
You have some proof they're doing anything inappropriate? Confident a judge would accept it if they sued for damage to their reputation and loss of potential business by allegations made in a public forum?
Regards, Dave
view thread (76+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Training events policy ... first test case
In-Reply-To: <200711041951040000@204315953>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox