public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedReviewing ftp tree
5+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]
* Reviewing ftp tree
@ 2007-11-05 23:35 Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
2007-11-05 23:48 ` Re: Reviewing ftp tree Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Joshua D. Drake @ 2007-11-05 23:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-www
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I was digging through our ftp tree today and noticed this:
binary/
drwxrwxr-x 4 ftp ftp 512 Sep 17 02:05 v8.2.5
drwxrwxr-x 4 ftp ftp 512 Oct 8 10:32 v8.3beta1
drwxr-xr-x 5 ftp ftp 512 Nov 2 06:33 v8.3beta2
v8.2.5/
drwxr-xr-x 4 ftp ftp 512 Sep 16 12:05 linux
drwxr-xr-x 2 ftp ftp 512 Sep 18 06:04 win32
linux/
drwxr-xr-x 4 ftp ftp 512 Sep 16 12:05 rpms
drwxr-xr-x 4 ftp ftp 512 Sep 16 12:05 srpms
It seems to me that this should be something more like:
packages/v8.2.5/linux/rh/rpms|srpms
/suse/rpms|srpms
win32/
win64/
Thoughts?
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHL6ipATb/zqfZUUQRAk/GAJ9+boXnH5ehWAeAn5BSuVk5DH1jzwCeMAMl
+FUpvwavOOstUMtHoKlmpwk=
=yVDS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Reviewing ftp tree
2007-11-05 23:35 Reviewing ftp tree Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
@ 2007-11-05 23:48 ` Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
2007-11-05 23:53 ` Re: Reviewing ftp tree Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Marc G. Fournier @ 2007-11-05 23:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>; pgsql-www
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- --On Monday, November 05, 2007 15:35:03 -0800 "Joshua D. Drake"
<[email protected]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
>
> I was digging through our ftp tree today and noticed this:
>
> binary/
> drwxrwxr-x 4 ftp ftp 512 Sep 17 02:05 v8.2.5
> drwxrwxr-x 4 ftp ftp 512 Oct 8 10:32 v8.3beta1
> drwxr-xr-x 5 ftp ftp 512 Nov 2 06:33 v8.3beta2
>
> v8.2.5/
> drwxr-xr-x 4 ftp ftp 512 Sep 16 12:05 linux
> drwxr-xr-x 2 ftp ftp 512 Sep 18 06:04 win32
>
> linux/
> drwxr-xr-x 4 ftp ftp 512 Sep 16 12:05 rpms
> drwxr-xr-x 4 ftp ftp 512 Sep 16 12:05 srpms
>
> It seems to me that this should be something more like:
>
> packages/v8.2.5/linux/rh/rpms|srpms
> /suse/rpms|srpms
> win32/
> win64/
'k, you've lost me ... we dont' have win64 binaries, else Dave would have put
that directory in (I suspect?), and is anyone doing suse binaries?
I'm not sure what changes you are proposing here ...
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . [email protected] MSN . [email protected]
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFHL6ux4QvfyHIvDvMRAiQRAJ4iZlzoZg9P54YIue2ZEhURgRSLIgCcD+Ej
/7lq2/tTelw2TrdtpdCJN4A=
=Rv+G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Reviewing ftp tree
2007-11-05 23:35 Reviewing ftp tree Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
2007-11-05 23:48 ` Re: Reviewing ftp tree Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
@ 2007-11-05 23:53 ` Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
2007-11-06 01:09 ` Re: Reviewing ftp tree Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Joshua D. Drake @ 2007-11-05 23:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-www
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 19:48:01 -0400
"Marc G. Fournier" <[email protected]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> - --On Monday, November 05, 2007 15:35:03 -0800 "Joshua D. Drake"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was digging through our ftp tree today and noticed this:
> >
> > binary/
> > drwxrwxr-x 4 ftp ftp 512 Sep 17 02:05 v8.2.5
> > drwxrwxr-x 4 ftp ftp 512 Oct 8 10:32 v8.3beta1
> > drwxr-xr-x 5 ftp ftp 512 Nov 2 06:33 v8.3beta2
> >
> > v8.2.5/
> > drwxr-xr-x 4 ftp ftp 512 Sep 16 12:05 linux
> > drwxr-xr-x 2 ftp ftp 512 Sep 18 06:04 win32
> >
> > linux/
> > drwxr-xr-x 4 ftp ftp 512 Sep 16 12:05 rpms
> > drwxr-xr-x 4 ftp ftp 512 Sep 16 12:05 srpms
> >
> > It seems to me that this should be something more like:
> >
> > packages/v8.2.5/linux/rh/rpms|srpms
> > /suse/rpms|srpms
> > win32/
> > win64/
>
> 'k, you've lost me ... we dont' have win64 binaries, else Dave would
> have put that directory in (I suspect?), and is anyone doing suse
> binaries?
Well win64 and suse were to illustrate how the tree could expand over
time. You are right that we don't currently have win64, but with 8.3 we
support VC++ so we could in theory support win64 for 8.4.
Secondly I have been playing with building SuSE rpms to keep that tree
up to date for older SuSE releases and I could see it extending from
there as well (for example postgresql 8.2 for Ubuntu Dapper).
The real difference here is that binary is misleading as we have source
packages in there and it isn't really binary as much as just a package
repo.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> I'm not sure what changes you are proposing here ...
>
> - ----
> Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services
> (http://www.hub.org) Email .
> [email protected] MSN . [email protected]
> Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
>
> iD8DBQFHL6ux4QvfyHIvDvMRAiQRAJ4iZlzoZg9P54YIue2ZEhURgRSLIgCcD+Ej
> /7lq2/tTelw2TrdtpdCJN4A=
> =Rv+G
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our
> list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHL6zuATb/zqfZUUQRAqonAJ9aAEbDAVY4YLr7kdHbK7NEHR+ZWQCfcpdU
YiGRSD29g7kKr7mNhGhYjO8=
=WX8B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Reviewing ftp tree
2007-11-05 23:35 Reviewing ftp tree Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
2007-11-05 23:48 ` Re: Reviewing ftp tree Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
2007-11-05 23:53 ` Re: Reviewing ftp tree Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
@ 2007-11-06 01:09 ` Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
2007-11-06 01:14 ` Re: Reviewing ftp tree Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Marc G. Fournier @ 2007-11-06 01:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-www
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- --On Monday, November 05, 2007 15:53:15 -0800 "Joshua D. Drake"
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Well win64 and suse were to illustrate how the tree could expand over
> time. You are right that we don't currently have win64, but with 8.3 we
> support VC++ so we could in theory support win64 for 8.4.
>
> Secondly I have been playing with building SuSE rpms to keep that tree
> up to date for older SuSE releases and I could see it extending from
> there as well (for example postgresql 8.2 for Ubuntu Dapper).
>
> The real difference here is that binary is misleading as we have source
> packages in there and it isn't really binary as much as just a package
> repo.
I'm not against it, just wanted to clarify what you were envisioning ...
+1 from here ...
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . [email protected] MSN . [email protected]
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFHL7634QvfyHIvDvMRAoI/AJ9K5Ka+I16JNkv8Gm6FxbKu2S63IwCggF79
89IlkzhOfnWr6Nu3zGSoO9w=
=VEN5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Reviewing ftp tree
2007-11-05 23:35 Reviewing ftp tree Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
2007-11-05 23:48 ` Re: Reviewing ftp tree Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
2007-11-05 23:53 ` Re: Reviewing ftp tree Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
2007-11-06 01:09 ` Re: Reviewing ftp tree Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
@ 2007-11-06 01:14 ` Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Joshua D. Drake @ 2007-11-06 01:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-www
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 21:09:11 -0400
"Marc G. Fournier" <[email protected]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> - --On Monday, November 05, 2007 15:53:15 -0800 "Joshua D. Drake"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> > Well win64 and suse were to illustrate how the tree could expand
> > over time. You are right that we don't currently have win64, but
> > with 8.3 we support VC++ so we could in theory support win64 for
> > 8.4.
> >
> > Secondly I have been playing with building SuSE rpms to keep that
> > tree up to date for older SuSE releases and I could see it
> > extending from there as well (for example postgresql 8.2 for Ubuntu
> > Dapper).
> >
> > The real difference here is that binary is misleading as we have
> > source packages in there and it isn't really binary as much as just
> > a package repo.
>
> I'm not against it, just wanted to clarify what you were
> envisioning ...
Sure :)
>
> +1 from here ...
>
> - ----
> Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services
> (http://www.hub.org) Email .
> [email protected] MSN . [email protected]
> Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
>
> iD8DBQFHL7634QvfyHIvDvMRAoI/AJ9K5Ka+I16JNkv8Gm6FxbKu2S63IwCggF79
> 89IlkzhOfnWr6Nu3zGSoO9w=
> =VEN5
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0,
> the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> joining column's datatypes do not match
>
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHL8AUATb/zqfZUUQRAg2iAJ9P0qp6Pbt9J4G9iRg6D0gb2TN2ugCdGZ7T
GMVephiz6FzL25EwywAZIYM=
=Db0j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-11-06 01:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-11-05 23:35 Reviewing ftp tree Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
2007-11-05 23:48 ` Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
2007-11-05 23:53 ` Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
2007-11-06 01:09 ` Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
2007-11-06 01:14 ` Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox