public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Karl O. Pinc <[email protected]>
To: Adrian Klaver <[email protected]>
Cc: Jonathan S. Katz <[email protected]>
Cc: Benjamin Scherrey <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Vik Fearing <[email protected]>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
Cc: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Describing Postgres as "object-relational" on the home page
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2024 19:22:42 -0600
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
	<CACo3ShjP=OcV=HsKEQuMFkAL2Z0E20==pUjKbhUd1keH20qQ0w@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>

On Mon, 1 Jan 2024 14:58:47 -0800
Adrian Klaver <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 1/1/24 11:44, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> > On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 14:40:49 -0500
> > "Jonathan S. Katz" <[email protected]> wrote:  
> 
> >> I don't really follow what you're suggesting here.  
> > 
> > The suggestion here is to first, change the "object-relational"
> > sentence as has been discussed.  (Then, tl,dr; use a interactive
> > "word cloud") But instead of coming up with wording describing
> > functionality, workloads, etc., to simply say "PostgrSQL does lots
> > more stuff." on the home page and link that to a page with nothing
> > but keywords. The keywords can be linked to descriptions or project
> > pages, or not.
> > 
> > That way nobody has to write sentences, and more importantly, nobody
> > has to maintain much when there's a new hot technology or
> > figure out what's important enough to put on the home page.  Just
> > add a new keyword to the keywords page.  (Especially labor free if
> > the keyword page is a pg wiki page.)
> > 
> > To extend this idea, just a list of keywords is not engaging.
> > Categorizing the keywords by attaching one or more tags to each
> > opens up possibilities for interaction and alternate ways to view
> > the keywords.  In particular the user can find keywords by tag and
> > so keywords need not be categorized in a fixed fashion.
> > This would likely only be interesting if the keywords were linked to
> > somewhere so that after getting a relevant set of keywords
> > the reader could follow the links to find information or tools.  
> 
> Please no, this is just another version of word salad.

Maybe so.  Though it seems common and useful to have one
thing categorized into multiple categories.  I think
categories guide the inquisitive.

But this is all useless hand-waving, at least for me, because
I'm not volunteering to do the work.  Apologies if I've taken
too much of your time.

Regards,

Karl <[email protected]>
Free Software:  "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
                 -- Robert A. Heinlein

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Describing Postgres as "object-relational" on the home page
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox