public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Alexey Borzov <[email protected]>
To: Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 23:56:44 +0400
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4306E8F@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk>
	<[email protected]>

Hi,

Josh Berkus wrote:
>>Which is why we investigated CMSs in depths before we started, and found
>>that even advanced ones such as Bricolage couldn't meet our requirements
>>
>>:-(.
> 
> No offense, but nobody "investigated existing CMSes in depth", or if they did, 
> it was not discussed on WWW.    What happend in my recollection was that the 
> people who were in favor of CMSes (like me) were not willing/able to do the 
> work to set them up, and the people who liked a more nuts-and-bolts system 
> were willing to do the work, so that's what we went with.  The people who do 
> the work get to make the decisions on how it's to be done.
> 
> Bricolage, for example, runs the WHO web site, the Register, Radio Free Asia, 
> and and several other major, multi-lingual sites.  It is also designed for 
> mirroring, working on the idea of "burning" stuff to HTML files instead of 
> dynamically served content.     It's quite capable of doing PostgreSQL.org.   
> The problem is that it requires Perl Mason expertise to set up and design 
> pages, and our WWW team is primarily HTML and PHP coders.

Yes, exactly, so now we must choose between an ugly (I openly admit this) system 
  written in ugly PHP that *runs* the current development version of 
postgresql.org [1] (that BTW has some open TODO items [2]) and a wonderful 
state-of-the-art CMS written in magnificient Perl that could *potentially* run a 
splendid new postgresql.org, if only someone actually wanted to do some work 
instead of praising the virtues of that particular CMS.

Isn't the choice obvious? ;)

> Gavin Roy is currently working on a system, Framewerk, which may become a 
> better fit for our community once he gets export-to-static-html working.   
> Actually, we could probably use it for Techdocs right now.  

[1] http://wwwdevel.postgresql.org/
[2] http://wwwdevel.postgresql.org/todo

view thread (17+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox