public inbox for [email protected]help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Co-admininning pgsql-announce 4+ messages / 3 participants [nested] [flat]
* Co-admininning pgsql-announce @ 2005-12-01 19:27 Josh Berkus <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Josh Berkus @ 2005-12-01 19:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-www Marc, Can you please make me (or someone else) co-moderator on pgsql-announce? Announcements are getting held up by as much as 3 days due to your workload (including one of mine which is time-critical). There are several people here who can help. Second, is there any way to change the reply-to setup on pgsql-announce? Currently anyone sending an announcement has to suffer through an average of 25-30 bounce messages. I don't think we're going to fix the bounces (there's 15,000 subscribers after all) but we could substitute a reply-to which would discard any replies. -- --Josh Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Co-admininning pgsql-announce @ 2005-12-06 05:02 Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]> parent: Josh Berkus <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Marc G. Fournier @ 2005-12-06 05:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Josh Berkus <[email protected]>; +Cc: Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>; pgsql-www re: postings to pgsql-announce ... as I've told others, if you post something, send me an email directly to let me know and I can login right there and then to process it through ... re: reply-to ... sure, but it won't fix your bounce issue, since things like postmaster and mailer-daemon don't honor reply-to's, as far as I know ... or do they? regardless if they do or not, teh reply to needs to be set to something legit, so where would you have it set to? pgsql-general? On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Josh Berkus wrote: > Marc, > > Can you please make me (or someone else) co-moderator on pgsql-announce? > Announcements are getting held up by as much as 3 days due to your > workload (including one of mine which is time-critical). There are > several people here who can help. > > Second, is there any way to change the reply-to setup on pgsql-announce? > Currently anyone sending an announcement has to suffer through an average > of 25-30 bounce messages. I don't think we're going to fix the bounces > (there's 15,000 subscribers after all) but we could substitute a reply-to > which would discard any replies. > > -- > --Josh > > Josh Berkus > Aglio Database Solutions > San Francisco > ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: [email protected] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Co-admininning pgsql-announce @ 2005-12-06 05:12 Josh Berkus <[email protected]> parent: Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Josh Berkus @ 2005-12-06 05:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-www Marc, > re: postings to pgsql-announce ... as I've told others, if you post > something, send me an email directly to let me know and I can login > right there and then to process it through ... Why not assign a co-moderator from the WWW team? Majordomo supports having secondary moderators. --Josh ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Co-admininning pgsql-announce @ 2005-12-06 08:44 Magnus Hagander <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Magnus Hagander @ 2005-12-06 08:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>; Josh Berkus <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-www > re: postings to pgsql-announce ... as I've told others, if > you post something, send me an email directly to let me know > and I can login right there and then to process it through ... > > re: reply-to ... sure, but it won't fix your bounce issue, > since things like postmaster and mailer-daemon don't honor > reply-to's, as far as I know ... or do they? They most definitly shouldn't. (That said, I'm sure there are some that do. But even M$ Exchange doesn't :P) There is, however, an Errors-To header you can set. Far from all mailers support that one, but some do. And IIRC there is an RFC about it somewhere, so it's not home-invented. > regardless if they do or not, teh reply to needs to be set to > something legit, so where would you have it set to? pgsql-general? Yes, the Reply-To is for human responses. So setting it to a different list seems quite reasonable. //Magnus ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-12-06 08:44 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2005-12-01 19:27 Co-admininning pgsql-announce Josh Berkus <[email protected]> 2005-12-06 05:02 ` Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]> 2005-12-06 05:12 ` Josh Berkus <[email protected]> 2005-12-06 08:44 Re: Co-admininning pgsql-announce Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox