public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
To: Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Planet posting policy
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:05:17 -0800
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABUevEzG2Qb5kuw5=YnAx9-aAhh0r5YJ9kdZNzA5CwQKbmvsmw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+OCxow3T9g-Cpt+B437vgCoYL+y83+LCYVw8Z42SnW3ciUB1g@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CA+OCxoxOTJjzLUpeCPdaA0so9yMUA20ABX+u8N=xKjmF4s3ocw@mail.gmail.com>
<CABUevEzWPnYr7PW6+GLh8Q6S+PvPi-7GKipE8ZuLPLRQKBLf_g@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CABUevEzG2Qb5kuw5=YnAx9-aAhh0r5YJ9kdZNzA5CwQKbmvsmw@mail.gmail.com>
Magnus,
> Did you read the example? It *was* basically a press release...
Not from my perspective. Dave's post tells me in factual language
exactly what the features of PEM are (or are intended to be), sufficient
to let me know if I should investigate PEM for my customers and PUG or
not.
And if you compare it to the EDB press release on the same topic, you'll
note some dramatic content and style differences. Based on the EDB
press release, I'd dismissed PEM as yet more EDB vaporware until I got
to pgOpen.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
view thread (52+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Planet posting policy
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox