public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedfavicons
11+ messages / 8 participants
[nested] [flat]
* favicons
@ 2008-03-12 19:16 Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
2008-03-12 19:25 ` Re: favicons Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
2008-03-12 19:29 ` Re: favicons Dave Page <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Peter Eisentraut @ 2008-03-12 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-www
There is a bizarre favicon inconsistency developing on *.postgresql.org
subsites:
www et al. blue elephant
wiki none
developer black elephant
archives blue elephant
buildfarm black elephant
git black elephant
www.postgresqlfr.org WTH???
Is there a secret meaning behind the black elephant or should we all move to
the blue one?
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: favicons
2008-03-12 19:16 favicons Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
@ 2008-03-12 19:25 ` Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Joshua D. Drake @ 2008-03-12 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-www
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:16:46 +0100
Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]> wrote:
> There is a bizarre favicon inconsistency developing on
> *.postgresql.org subsites:
>
> www et al. blue elephant
> wiki none
> developer black elephant
> archives blue elephant
> buildfarm black elephant
> git black elephant
> www.postgresqlfr.org WTH???
postgresqlfr is drupal.
Joshua D. Drake
- --
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL political pundit | Mocker of Dolphins
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFH2C4mATb/zqfZUUQRAg4PAJ0SnGroZ+YxEed9EBUSqQji+KDmPgCgn8BW
oY34YiDTYwBmImBVg3VMc04=
=j/h7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: favicons
2008-03-12 19:16 favicons Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
@ 2008-03-12 19:29 ` Dave Page <[email protected]>
2008-03-12 20:19 ` Re: favicons Guillaume Lelarge <[email protected]>
2008-03-12 21:01 ` Re: favicons Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
1 sibling, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Dave Page @ 2008-03-12 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-www
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]> wrote:
> There is a bizarre favicon inconsistency developing on *.postgresql.org
> subsites:
>
> www et al. blue elephant
> wiki none
> developer black elephant
> archives blue elephant
> buildfarm black elephant
> git black elephant
> www.postgresqlfr.org WTH???
>
> Is there a secret meaning behind the black elephant or should we all move to
> the blue one?
Black for developer sites, blue for user? I don't think there's any
plan behind it though, just coincidence. I'm happy to use the blue one
everywhere.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK Ltd: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: favicons
2008-03-12 19:16 favicons Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
2008-03-12 19:29 ` Re: favicons Dave Page <[email protected]>
@ 2008-03-12 20:19 ` Guillaume Lelarge <[email protected]>
2008-03-12 20:29 ` Re: favicons Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
2008-03-12 21:22 ` Re: favicons Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
1 sibling, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Guillaume Lelarge @ 2008-03-12 20:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Page <[email protected]>; +Cc: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>; pgsql-www
Dave Page a écrit :
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]> wrote:
>> There is a bizarre favicon inconsistency developing on *.postgresql.org
>> subsites:
>>
>> www et al. blue elephant
>> wiki none
>> developer black elephant
>> archives blue elephant
>> buildfarm black elephant
>> git black elephant
>> www.postgresqlfr.org WTH???
>>
>> Is there a secret meaning behind the black elephant or should we all move to
>> the blue one?
>
> Black for developer sites, blue for user? I don't think there's any
> plan behind it though, just coincidence. I'm happy to use the blue one
> everywhere.
>
Perhaps we can do like the mozilla folks just did a few days ago. They
have different favicons for their different websites but they at least
keep a small mozilla head on each of them. See http://www.mozilla.org/
with the red lizard head, see http://wiki.mozilla.org with the book and
a small red lizard head. You can also get a look here
http://www.chevrel.org/fr/carnet/index.php?2008/02/29/698-nouvelles-favicones-pour-les-sites-mozilla
(french text but the toolbar seems to me self explanatory).
Regards.
--
Guillaume.
http://www.postgresqlfr.org
http://dalibo.com
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: favicons
2008-03-12 19:16 favicons Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
2008-03-12 19:29 ` Re: favicons Dave Page <[email protected]>
2008-03-12 20:19 ` Re: favicons Guillaume Lelarge <[email protected]>
@ 2008-03-12 20:29 ` Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Alvaro Herrera @ 2008-03-12 20:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guillaume Lelarge <[email protected]>; +Cc: Dave Page <[email protected]>; Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>; pgsql-www
Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> Perhaps we can do like the mozilla folks just did a few days ago. They
> have different favicons for their different websites but they at least
> keep a small mozilla head on each of them. See http://www.mozilla.org/
> with the red lizard head, see http://wiki.mozilla.org with the book and
> a small red lizard head. You can also get a look here
> http://www.chevrel.org/fr/carnet/index.php?2008/02/29/698-nouvelles-favicones-pour-les-sites-mozilla
> (french text but the toolbar seems to me self explanatory).
Nice idea, though my first reaction to the toolbar was "what the heck
are those little red butterflies". I'm not sure if you're going to be
able to fit an elephant on a small area leaving enough space for the
other icon behind it.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: favicons
2008-03-12 19:16 favicons Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
2008-03-12 19:29 ` Re: favicons Dave Page <[email protected]>
2008-03-12 20:19 ` Re: favicons Guillaume Lelarge <[email protected]>
@ 2008-03-12 21:22 ` Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
2008-03-12 21:27 ` Re: favicons Tom Lane <[email protected]>
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Greg Sabino Mullane @ 2008-03-12 21:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-www
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
> Is there a secret meaning behind the black elephant or should
> we all move to the blue one?
Basically, I created the black version de novo in March of 2002
because the project did not have one yet. At some point the newer
blue one was created, but many sites used the black one because
the blue was not yet created (or because they liked it better?)
I'd not be too upset if the black one was replaced, but I'll
point out that mine weighs in at a mere 124 bytes, which indicates
the blue one, at 2550 bytes, might be in need of a vacuum full. :)
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane [email protected]
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200803121720
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iEYEAREDAAYFAkfYSS0ACgkQvJuQZxSWSsgi7gCgx42uVQ0+zrJPm6SBRbl7Kz6n
kvUAoKP5/4PXZTPRnnG1sv5hgD0Qwt1j
=IpU9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: favicons
2008-03-12 19:16 favicons Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
2008-03-12 19:29 ` Re: favicons Dave Page <[email protected]>
2008-03-12 20:19 ` Re: favicons Guillaume Lelarge <[email protected]>
2008-03-12 21:22 ` Re: favicons Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
@ 2008-03-12 21:27 ` Tom Lane <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Tom Lane @ 2008-03-12 21:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-www
"Greg Sabino Mullane" <[email protected]> writes:
> Basically, I created the black version de novo in March of 2002
> because the project did not have one yet. At some point the newer
> blue one was created, but many sites used the black one because
> the blue was not yet created (or because they liked it better?)
> I'd not be too upset if the black one was replaced, but I'll
> point out that mine weighs in at a mere 124 bytes, which indicates
> the blue one, at 2550 bytes, might be in need of a vacuum full. :)
pngcrush?
regards, tom lane
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: favicons
2008-03-12 19:16 favicons Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
2008-03-12 19:29 ` Re: favicons Dave Page <[email protected]>
@ 2008-03-12 21:01 ` Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
2008-04-18 14:59 ` Re: favicons Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Magnus Hagander @ 2008-03-12 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Page <[email protected]>; +Cc: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>; pgsql-www
On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 19:29 +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]> wrote:
> > There is a bizarre favicon inconsistency developing on *.postgresql.org
> > subsites:
> >
> > www et al. blue elephant
> > wiki none
> > developer black elephant
> > archives blue elephant
> > buildfarm black elephant
> > git black elephant
> > www.postgresqlfr.org WTH???
> >
> > Is there a secret meaning behind the black elephant or should we all move to
> > the blue one?
>
> Black for developer sites, blue for user? I don't think there's any
> plan behind it though, just coincidence. I'm happy to use the blue one
> everywhere.
I'm fairly certain it's "old sites" -> "ugly black elephant" and "new
sites" -> "pretty blue elephant".
Then git and buildfarm probably just copied it off
developer.postgresql.org without checking what was available :-)
personally, I like the blue one much better, and would suggest we switch
all postgresql.org sites to it :-)
//Magnus
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: favicons
2008-03-12 19:16 favicons Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
2008-03-12 19:29 ` Re: favicons Dave Page <[email protected]>
2008-03-12 21:01 ` Re: favicons Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
@ 2008-04-18 14:59 ` Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
2008-04-21 08:32 ` Re: favicons Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Peter Eisentraut @ 2008-04-18 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-www; +Cc: Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
Am Mittwoch, 12. März 2008 schrieb Magnus Hagander:
> personally, I like the blue one much better, and would suggest we switch
> all postgresql.org sites to it :-)
Where is the original version of this image, so I can convert it to the format
I need?
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: favicons
2008-03-12 19:16 favicons Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
2008-03-12 19:29 ` Re: favicons Dave Page <[email protected]>
2008-03-12 21:01 ` Re: favicons Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
2008-04-18 14:59 ` Re: favicons Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
@ 2008-04-21 08:32 ` Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
2008-04-21 11:25 ` Re: favicons Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Magnus Hagander @ 2008-04-21 08:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-www
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 12. März 2008 schrieb Magnus Hagander:
> > personally, I like the blue one much better, and would suggest we
> > switch all postgresql.org sites to it :-)
>
> Where is the original version of this image, so I can convert it to
> the format I need?
The favicon? You can just grab it from the website, no? All websites
need the same format, AFAIK?
While I haven't looked at it (since I didn't turn it into the .ico), I
think there are high res (or vector even) version of it available on
the graphics project on pgFoundry.
//Magnus
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: favicons
2008-03-12 19:16 favicons Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
2008-03-12 19:29 ` Re: favicons Dave Page <[email protected]>
2008-03-12 21:01 ` Re: favicons Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
2008-04-18 14:59 ` Re: favicons Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
2008-04-21 08:32 ` Re: favicons Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
@ 2008-04-21 11:25 ` Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Peter Eisentraut @ 2008-04-21 11:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-www; +Cc: Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
Am Montag, 21. April 2008 schrieb Magnus Hagander:
> The favicon? You can just grab it from the website, no? All websites
> need the same format, AFAIK?
I need a PNG format file, but I got one now by "unpacking" the favicon.ico.
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-04-21 11:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-03-12 19:16 favicons Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
2008-03-12 19:25 ` Joshua D. Drake <[email protected]>
2008-03-12 19:29 ` Dave Page <[email protected]>
2008-03-12 20:19 ` Guillaume Lelarge <[email protected]>
2008-03-12 20:29 ` Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
2008-03-12 21:22 ` Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
2008-03-12 21:27 ` Tom Lane <[email protected]>
2008-03-12 21:01 ` Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
2008-04-18 14:59 ` Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
2008-04-21 08:32 ` Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
2008-04-21 11:25 ` Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox