public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Spam filtering on the mailing lists
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:48:22 -0300
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



- --On Thursday, July 17, 2008 15:54:41 +0000 Greg Sabino Mullane 
<[email protected]> wrote:

> I grabbed a few random messages from the bugs list last night. Most
> interesting was that some had no X-Spam-Status headers at all - does this
> mean they slipped through the spam filtering entirely? Here's one of them:
>
> ===
> Return-Path: <[email protected]>
> Delivered-To: [email protected]
> Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183])
>         by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3148650275
>         for <[email protected]>; Wed, 16 Jul 2008
> 15:40:45 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
>  by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
>  with ESMTP id 48600-04-3 for <[email protected]>;
>  Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:40:43 -0300 (ADT)
> X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
> Received: from wwwmaster.postgresql.org (wwwmaster.postgresql.org
> [217.196.146.204])         by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id
> AB1D565026D
>         for <[email protected]>; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:40:44 -0300 (ADT)
> Received: from wwwmaster.postgresql.org (wwwmaster.postgresql.org
> [217.196.146.204])         by wwwmaster.postgresql.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with
> ESMTP id m6GIehuA007983         for <[email protected]>; Wed, 16 Jul
> 2008 18:40:43 GMT         (envelope-from [email protected])
> Received: (from www@localhost)
>         by wwwmaster.postgresql.org (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m6GIehIP007982;
>         Wed, 16 Jul 2008 18:40:43 GMT
>         (envelope-from www)
> Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 18:40:43 GMT
> Message-Id: <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: BUG #4310: PkMERMInZQ
> From: "make money on line" <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1

The X-Virus-Scanned indicates it went through Amavis/Maia, not sure why it 
would have bypassed the spam checker though ... let me check into it to make 
sure, as I thought both "outbound" and "inbound" was scanned, but maybe just 
for virus, with the expectation that if you are using a spam scanner on 
incoming, you aren't sending *out* spam ...



- -- 
Marc G. Fournier        Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org)
Email . [email protected]                              MSN . [email protected]
Yahoo . yscrappy               Skype: hub.org        ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkh/sBYACgkQ4QvfyHIvDvMDowCfXL1i6nLlR8u8zsWmJVr4z8Ue
r1EAniwfru0hTeNWPliF+nBvANpxOFaf
=3zw9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





view thread (18+ messages)

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Spam filtering on the mailing lists
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox