public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Jonathan S. Katz <[email protected]>
To: Dave Page <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL WWW <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Sponsorship Page Language
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:08:15 -0500
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+OCxowpdB1J-jXy4WkQXuJZjPSHHWqAEEJrpZyGU+8jbUyHZA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]>
<CA+OCxowpdB1J-jXy4WkQXuJZjPSHHWqAEEJrpZyGU+8jbUyHZA@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsub%20pgsql-www>
On Jan 11, 2013, at 11:02 AM, Dave Page wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Jonathan S. Katz
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> When looking at the sponsorship page
>> (http://www.postgresql.org/about/sponsors/) I noticed a few things regarding
>> the language that I've attempted to clean up with this patch.
>>
>> The first regards the ordering of the sponsors - they are ordered randomly,
>> not alphabetically, so I corrected the language up top.
>
> I would think a better option would be to fix the ordering so the page
> works as intended.
I discussed with Magnus off-list about that prior to submitting the page, he suggested to change the wording
>
>> The second has to do with the language on the bottom of the page discussing
>> the sponsorship levels and selection process. I reworded the sentences to
>> more clearly state the purpose of the sponsorship levels are and how they
>> are selected, maintaing a link to the guidelines on the wiki.
>
> The wording there was pretty carefully chosen after a long discussion
> in the sponsor committee, so it shouldn't be changed on a whim. That
> said, I don't actually think your wording is an improvement (though, I
> may be biased as if memory serves I wrote that's there now).
Typo aside in the original text, reading through it did not make sense:
"Sponsorship levels are meant to provide the general public an idea of how levels are determined."
From that I glean that sponsorship levels tell me how sponsorship levels are determined. Um...?
That said I understand that there was thought that went into the wording, particularly on the Wiki, thus I do not intend to throw everything out "on a whim," but that sentence is not clear at all.
I've included the patch with Thom's suggestions & fixes.
Jonathan
Attachments:
[application/octet-stream] 0001-Modified-text-on-sponsorship-page.patch (2.0K, 3-0001-Modified-text-on-sponsorship-page.patch)
download | inline diff:
From 346516a00716d0a96f9981fd01136e632babe192 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Jonathan S. Katz" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:42:10 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Modified text on sponsorship page
---
templates/sponsors/sponsors.html | 20 ++++++++------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/templates/sponsors/sponsors.html b/templates/sponsors/sponsors.html
index 88b5dfc..45e6961 100644
--- a/templates/sponsors/sponsors.html
+++ b/templates/sponsors/sponsors.html
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
<h1>Sponsors</h1>
<p><span class="txtMediumGrey">The following is a categorized list of significant sponsors to PostgreSQL.
-Sponsors are listed in alphabetical order within each section, with just the location of the head office
+Sponsors are displayed in no particular order within each section, with just the location of the head office
for each company shown.
</span></p>
@@ -34,17 +34,13 @@ for each company shown.
</div>
<div class="tblBasic">
-<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tblBasicGrey">
-<tr class="lastrow">
-<th colspan="3">Sponsorship levels are meant to provide the general public and idea of how levels are determined.
- They are not set in stone and all sponsorship recognition shall be determined on its own merits by the
- <a href="http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Sponsoring">Sponsorship Committee</a> as determined by a simple majority vote.
-</th>
-
-</tr>
-
-</table>
-
+ <table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tblBasicGrey">
+ <tr class="lastrow">
+ <th colspan="3">
+ Sponsorship levels are meant to demonstrate the overall contributions of various organizations to PostgreSQL. All sponsorship recognition is determined by a majority vote from the <a href="http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Sponsoring">Sponsorship Committee</a> in accordance with <a href="http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Sponsoring">these guidelines</a>.
+ </th>
+ </tr>
+ </table>
</div>
{%endblock%}
--
1.7.9.6 (Apple Git-31.1)
view thread (21+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Sponsorship Page Language
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox