public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedRe: [Kennisgres-pgdn] RE: Mailing list, Joint PostgreSQL Knowledge Base
3+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]
* Re: [Kennisgres-pgdn] RE: Mailing list, Joint PostgreSQL Knowledge Base
@ 2005-12-03 21:30 Dave Page <[email protected]>
2005-12-03 21:45 ` Re: [Kennisgres-pgdn] RE: Mailing list, Joint PostgreSQL Knowledge Base Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dave Page @ 2005-12-03 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; +Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; pgsql-www
-----Original Message-----
From: "Josh Berkus"<[email protected]>
Sent: 03/12/05 21:05:59
To: "Dave Page"<[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]"<[email protected]>, "[email protected]"<[email protected]>, "[email protected]"<[email protected]>, "[email protected]"<[email protected]>, "[email protected]"<[email protected]>, "[email protected]"<[email protected]>, "[email protected]"<[email protected]>, "[email protected]"<[email protected]>, "[email protected]"<[email protected]>, "[email protected]"<[email protected]>, "[email protected]"<[email protected]>, "[email protected]"<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Kennisgres-pgdn] RE: Mailing list, Joint PostgreSQL Knowledge Base
> Huh? I don't get it. How does "part of www.postgresql.org" contradict
> that?
It doesn't, but kb.postgresql.org would as it would be a separate site. I don't object to something like that being proposed, but given the previous decision (which goes back to around the launch of the previous www site iirc), it should be proposed in the right place.
Of course, that doesn't mean that this group cannot decide whether or not to make that proposal.
Regards, Dave
-----Unmodified Original Message-----
Dave,
> > 1) Should be part of www.postgresql.org or be kb.postgresql.org.
>
> Aside from being a dubious "business requirement" imho, I should remind
> you that a decision was made long ago by the community to merge all the
> postgresql.org subsites together, and not to create new ones. Reviewing
> and potentially overturning that decision is definitely not something
> for this forum.
Huh? I don't get it. How does "part of www.postgresql.org" contradict
that?
--
--Josh Berkus
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Project Core Team
www.postgresql.org
(all opinions expressed are my own; I do not speak
for the Project unless specifically noted.)
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Kennisgres-pgdn] RE: Mailing list, Joint PostgreSQL Knowledge Base
2005-12-03 21:30 Re: [Kennisgres-pgdn] RE: Mailing list, Joint PostgreSQL Knowledge Base Dave Page <[email protected]>
@ 2005-12-03 21:45 ` Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
2005-12-03 21:58 ` Re: [Kennisgres-pgdn] RE: Mailing list, Joint PostgreSQL Dave Page <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Josh Berkus @ 2005-12-03 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Page <[email protected]>; +Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; pgsql-www
Dave,
> Of course, that doesn't mean that this group cannot decide whether or
> not to make that proposal.
Right, the proposal would be "www.postgresql.org or kb.postgresql.org".
Presumably, the WWW group would decide on www.postgresql.org.
--
--Josh Berkus
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Project Core Team
www.postgresql.org
(all opinions expressed are my own; I do not speak
for the Project unless specifically noted.)
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Kennisgres-pgdn] RE: Mailing list, Joint PostgreSQL
2005-12-03 21:30 Re: [Kennisgres-pgdn] RE: Mailing list, Joint PostgreSQL Knowledge Base Dave Page <[email protected]>
2005-12-03 21:45 ` Re: [Kennisgres-pgdn] RE: Mailing list, Joint PostgreSQL Knowledge Base Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
@ 2005-12-03 21:58 ` Dave Page <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dave Page @ 2005-12-03 21:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: [email protected]; +Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; pgsql-www
On 3/12/05 9:45 pm, "Josh Berkus" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dave,
>
>> Of course, that doesn't mean that this group cannot decide whether or
>> not to make that proposal.
>
> Right, the proposal would be "www.postgresql.org or kb.postgresql.org".
> Presumably, the WWW group would decide on www.postgresql.org.
Not necessarily - the group has changed a lot since the decision was
originally made. I can only say that I will argue against having a separate
site.
Regards, Dave
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-12-03 21:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-12-03 21:30 Re: [Kennisgres-pgdn] RE: Mailing list, Joint PostgreSQL Knowledge Base Dave Page <[email protected]>
2005-12-03 21:45 ` Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
2005-12-03 21:58 ` Re: [Kennisgres-pgdn] RE: Mailing list, Joint PostgreSQL Dave Page <[email protected]>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox