public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Guillaume Lelarge <[email protected]>
To: Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
Cc: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Page <[email protected]>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Some restructuring of the download section
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 10:44:33 +0200
Message-ID: <ea6bcf99f1f67bfe3a1cf20e6004c1b0@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABUevEwvdJJ6W_KhLugaRxsK15_6qe40RDQ0jmdM7YzT_K=OfQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]>
<CA+OCxozggGgpNSEyhzGhQsatpvc1HApKgY7eOGd9ANk_zj+Lcg@mail.gmail.com>
<CABUevEwL0sXtigQ5soDWF66kJd=DVc4FY-t8ge1h-XNLru7__w@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+OCxoxR_Yr_-X2H4GFmc5XxG0OsJ4YDE++NUHdSVbeNyCJ85Q@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<CABUevEwvdJJ6W_KhLugaRxsK15_6qe40RDQ0jmdM7YzT_K=OfQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 08:44:24 +0800, Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 12:40 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Dave Page <[email protected]> writes:
>>> > On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Magnus Hagander
>>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >> Uh, that part is just incorrect. Several sets of platform packages
>>> >> certainly do initdb for you. And AFAIK every single one of them on
>>> >> Linux at least do service setup for you.
>>>
>>> > Hmm, clearly it's been a while since I did a PG installation on
Debian
>>> > (oddly!), as that does seem to leave the server up and running. I'm
>>> > fairly certain it didn't in the past.
>>> > RPMs on the other hand, do not.
>>>
>>> FWIW, Red-Hat-based systems have a strong distro policy against
starting
>>> servers merely because the package got installed --- the theory is
that
>>> an "everything" install should not leave the user running a bunch of
>>> servers he doesn't know about and maybe hasn't configured securely.
>>>
>>> I'm a bit surprised to hear that Debian does it differently; although
>>> it's possible that they distinguish manual from automatic install
>>> scenarios. It's a little bit saner to do an auto service start if you
>>> know that the user explicitly requested this specific package.
>>>
>>
>> When you use aptitude or apt-get to install the server package, it will
>> install the binaires, execute initdb, and start the server. I much
>> prefer the RPM way of doing it (IOW, not starting the server). Anyway,
I
>> guess there are both pros and cons in both methods.
>
> Yeah. But it's a good point that since they are different, I should
> add info to each of the pages saying exactly how it behaves on that
> specific platform.
I'm not sure this is really our responsibility. The package maintainer
should have a webpage explaining how his packages work.
--
Guillaume
http://www.postgresql.fr
http://dalibo.com
view thread (35+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Some restructuring of the download section
In-Reply-To: <ea6bcf99f1f67bfe3a1cf20e6004c1b0@localhost>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox