agora inbox for pljava-dev@postgresql.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed[Pljava-dev] Priorities for pljava binaries
6+ messages / 0 participants
[nested] [flat]
* [Pljava-dev] Priorities for pljava binaries
@ 2011-01-20 14:23
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: @ 2011-01-20 14:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hello all,
As a pljava user for the last 3 or 4 years, but with limited skills in building software from source, my priorities for pljava binaries would be (all for Postgres 9 and Java 1.6) :
a) Windows 7 on 64 bit
b) Ubuntu 10.10 (Linux base)
c) Windows 7 on 32 bit
Regards
David JL Gradwell
e: david.gradwell at vocalink.com<mailto:david.gradwell at vocalink.com>
*****************************************************
This email is issued by a VocaLink group company. It is confidential and intended for the exclusive use of the addressee only. You should not disclose its contents to any other person. If you are not the addressee (or responsible for delivery of the message to the addressee), please notify the originator immediately by return message and destroy the original message. The contents of this email will have no contractual effect unless it is otherwise agreed between a specific VocaLink group company and the recipient.
The VocaLink group companies include, among others: VocaLink Limited (Company No 06119048, VAT No. 907 9619 87) which is registered in England and Wales at registered office Drake House, Homestead Road, Rickmansworth, WD3 1FX. United Kingdom, Voca Limited (Company no 1023742, VAT No. 907 9619 87) which is registered in England and Wales at registered office Drake House, Three Rivers Court, Homestead Road, Rickmansworth, Hertfordshire. WD3 1FX. United Kingdom, LINK Interchange Network Limited (Company No 3565766, VAT No. 907 9619 87) which is registered in England and Wales at registered office Arundel House, 1 Liverpool Gardens, Worthing, West Sussex, BN11 1SL and VocaLink Holdings Limited (Company No 06119036, VAT No. 907 9619 87) which is registered in England and Wales at registered office Drake House, Homestead Road, Rickmansworth, WD3 1FX. United Kingdom.
The views and opinions expressed in this email may not reflect those of any member of the VocaLink group. This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses prior to leaving the VocaLink group network; however, VocaLink does not guarantee the security of this message and will not be responsible for any damages arising as a result of any virus being passed on or arising from any alteration of this message by a third party. The VocaLink group may monitor emails sent to and from the VocaLink group network.
This message has been checked for all email viruses by MessageLabs.
*************************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pgfoundry.org/pipermail/pljava-dev/attachments/20110120/cbb5180e/attachment.html;
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread
* [Pljava-dev] Priorities for pljava binaries
@ 2011-01-20 18:16
parent:
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: @ 2011-01-20 18:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
On 01/20/11 6:23 AM, David Gradwell wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> As a pljava user for the last 3 or 4 years, but with limited skills in
> building software from source, my priorities for pljava binaries would
> be (all for Postgres 9 and Java 1.6) :
>
> a)Windows 7 on 64 bit
>
> b)Ubuntu 10.10 (Linux base)
>
> c)Windows 7 on 32 bit
>
>
I've had to build pljava to run on Sun Solaris on Sparc, X86, and IBM
AIX on Power. all these were with Postgres 8.4. Sadly, all this was
done on secure internal systems, and I'm not allowed to share any of the
results. I believe I did post some stuff on this email list about what
it took to get it working on Solaris, with Sun Studio C etc.
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread
* [Pljava-dev] Priorities for pljava binaries
@ 2011-01-20 19:00
parent:
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: @ 2011-01-20 19:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hi all,
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:16:55 -0000, John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com>
wrote:
> I've had to build pljava to run on Sun Solaris on Sparc, X86, and IBM
> AIX on Power. all these were with Postgres 8.4. Sadly, all this was
> done on secure internal systems, and I'm not allowed to share any of the
> results. I believe I did post some stuff on this email list about what
> it took to get it working on Solaris, with Sun Studio C etc.
I've myself used it on Solaris amd64, though compiled with gcc. I'm
working on another C module I've built against x86 PG 9.0 on Linux with
the Sun (now Solaris) Studio 12.2 C compiler. If there are any issues on
Solaris with Studio I'll fix them. Sadly I'm using 11 Express and can't
make Solaris 10 binaries at the moment and unfortunately I do not have
access to Sparc or Power machines.
Right now I'm working on Linux binaries, both amd64 and i686. Next I'll
take a look at what I can do about Windows. My CPU does not have that
virtualization thingy so I'm not sure I can run it in VirtualBox.
--
Johann Oskarsson http://www.2ndquadrant.com/ |[]
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services --+--
|
Blog: http://my.opera.com/myrkraverk/blog/
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread
* [Pljava-dev] Priorities for pljava binaries
@ 2011-01-22 01:18
parent:
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: @ 2011-01-22 01:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
I would also like a binary for PostgreSQL 9.x on Windows 7 Professional
64-bit and Java 1.6.
Is there a difference between using 32-bit and 64-bit PostgreSQL. If so
I would want it for 32-bit PostgreSQL
Are there any existing binaries that would be compatible with my target
system?
Cheers, Eric
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread
* [Pljava-dev] Priorities for pljava binaries
@ 2011-01-22 01:31
parent:
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: @ 2011-01-22 01:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 01:18:46 -0000, Eric Kolotyluk
<eric.kolotyluk at gmail.com> wrote:
> I would also like a binary for PostgreSQL 9.x on Windows 7 Professional
> 64-bit and Java 1.6.
Unfortunately, I do not have time to work on PL/Java binaries for Windows
myself until sometime in February. All my attempts at cross compiling
have failed so far. That said, if there is a commercial reason to hurry
it up, something may be arranged through 2ndQuadrant as they are paying
for my time.
> Is there a difference between using 32-bit and 64-bit PostgreSQL. If so
> I would want it for 32-bit PostgreSQL
I recall reading somewhere in the installation/compilation guide for
PostgreSQL that 32bit applications do not run "natively" on 64bit CPU/OS
on the amd64 architecture and will be slower. I advice not to take my
words for it and either google for more information or test it.
> Are there any existing binaries that would be compatible with my target
> system?
None that I know of. You can use PL/Java compiled with JDK 5 with a Java
6 virtual machine but it needs to be compiled for PostgreSQL 9.
--
Johann Oskarsson http://www.2ndquadrant.com/ |[]
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services --+--
|
Blog: http://my.opera.com/myrkraverk/blog/
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread
* [Pljava-dev] Priorities for pljava binaries
@ 2011-01-22 01:57
parent:
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: @ 2011-01-22 01:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
On 2011-01-21 5:31 PM, Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 01:18:46 -0000, Eric Kolotyluk
> <eric.kolotyluk at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I would also like a binary for PostgreSQL 9.x on Windows 7 Professional
>> 64-bit and Java 1.6.
>
> Unfortunately, I do not have time to work on PL/Java binaries for
> Windows myself until sometime in February. All my attempts at cross
> compiling have failed so far. That said, if there is a commercial
> reason to hurry it up, something may be arranged through 2ndQuadrant
> as they are paying for my time.
Rats. I'm currently doing a feasibility study of using PostgreSQL and
need to have some conclusions by the end of the month. I hate having to
build projects from source as it always seems to be 10 times more effort
than I expect. I'm wondering if it would be less effort to take one of
the existing Windows binaries, and just install that version of
PostgreSQL and friends :-)
If someone else is having trouble building binaries, I'm probably going
to have the same trouble.
>
>> Is there a difference between using 32-bit and 64-bit PostgreSQL. If so
>> I would want it for 32-bit PostgreSQL
>
> I recall reading somewhere in the installation/compilation guide for
> PostgreSQL that 32bit applications do not run "natively" on 64bit
> CPU/OS on the amd64 architecture and will be slower. I advice not to
> take my words for it and either google for more information or test it.
>
>> Are there any existing binaries that would be compatible with my target
>> system?
>
> None that I know of. You can use PL/Java compiled with JDK 5 with a
> Java 6 virtual machine but it needs to be compiled for PostgreSQL 9.
>
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-01-22 01:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-01-20 14:23 [Pljava-dev] Priorities for pljava binaries
2011-01-20 18:16 `
2011-01-20 19:00 `
2011-01-22 01:18 `
2011-01-22 01:31 `
2011-01-22 01:57 `
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox