public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Adrian Klaver <[email protected]>
To: Daniele Varrazzo <[email protected]>
To: Psycopg <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: psycopg Chinese domains and internet keyword
Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 09:03:28 -0700
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+mi_8YDzyHmaZusCN0Nt-YhqLtf6QcKqt+WBWQAEoQL3D-83w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]>
<CA+mi_8YLEyJzh-Y6+wSR6tgHwAxdkGB=CXCT6pcem1K7LLHvMA@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+mi_8a=EPd1cYhFSSFtGn-oWj_47U+1NGcqBrQhz2Fx3pk_-g@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+mi_8YDzyHmaZusCN0Nt-YhqLtf6QcKqt+WBWQAEoQL3D-83w@mail.gmail.com>
On 5/5/25 08:51, Daniele Varrazzo wrote:
> On Mon, 5 May 2025 at 14:28, Daniele Varrazzo
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> As someone less naïve than me might have figured out, this is most
> likely a scam.
>
> However I don't see impossible that someone may start claiming to be
> "more psycopg than us", register the .com domain with a mirror site
> and start pushing malicious content.
>
> Are there reasonable things to do in that case? Are there precedents
> to use as reference? I'd be curious to know.
The simplest is defensive registration, registering variations of the
domain in the projects name.
Here is what looks to be a pretty clear look at the basic issues:
https://bpp.msu.edu/magazine/domain-name-strategy-to-protect-brand-identity-september2020/
>
> Cheers
>
> -- Daniele
>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
[email protected]
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: psycopg Chinese domains and internet keyword
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox