public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Daniele Varrazzo <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: psycopg is the new psycopg3?
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 17:12:05 +0000
Message-ID: <CA+mi_8Y5L-gnio+RUs6XtfOqEbOAiyVS8y9XqYSkfLB8dnPd8w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Hello,

I have received some concerned voices in regard to have a package called
"psycopg3". I guess many have been burned out by the Python 2 to 3
transition, and now it's not a happy pair of number to see next to each
other. Sorry, Fibonacci...

The rationale behind having the 2 in the package name was to allow the
coexistence between v1 and 2. But now that nobody uses v1 anymore, I think
the name can be considered free. I believe it even predates pypi and the
requirements.txt convention. Dark times...

Anyone against using "psycopg" as package name, and starting from 3 as
version number?

Cheers,

-- Daniele

view thread (19+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected]
  Subject: Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3?
  In-Reply-To: <CA+mi_8Y5L-gnio+RUs6XtfOqEbOAiyVS8y9XqYSkfLB8dnPd8w@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox