pg.ddx.io  pgsql-admin@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ray Stell <stellr@cns.vt.edu>
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: PostgreSQL 9.0.3 streaming replication failure
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 08:55:48 -0500
Message-ID: <20110209135548.GA27471@cns.vt.edu> (raw)

I had set up this streaming replication pair of systems a few days ago and
everything seemed pretty happy as changes were being replicated.  I set
it up without wal archiving turned up.  The backup log this morning caught
my eye.  I find the standby reports to have activated itself. 

I don't see anything in the postmaster logs on this event.

The backup log caught my eye:
-------------------------------
 pg_start_backup 
-----------------
 1/E0000020
(1 row)

NOTICE:  WAL archiving is not enabled; you must ensure that all required WAL segments are copied through other means to complete the backup
 pg_stop_backup 
----------------
 1/E00000C4
(1 row)


on original  prod:
-------------------------
$ pg_controldata  /var/database/pgsql/tws
WARNING: Calculated CRC checksum does not match value stored in file.
Either the file is corrupt, or it has a different layout than this program
is expecting.  The results below are untrustworthy.

pg_control version number:            903
Catalog version number:               201008051
Database system identifier:           5569584977953909783
Database cluster state:               unrecognized status code
pg_control last modified:             Wed 09 Feb 2011 08:47:29 AM EST
Latest checkpoint location:           0/1
Prior checkpoint location:            E201229C/1
Latest checkpoint's REDO location:    E201221C/1
Latest checkpoint's TimeLineID:       3791725164
Latest checkpoint's NextXID:          1/0
Latest checkpoint's NextOID:          670
Latest checkpoint's NextMultiXactId:  24579
Latest checkpoint's NextMultiOffset:  1
Time of latest checkpoint:            Wed 31 Dec 1969 07:00:00 PM EST
Minimum recovery ending location:     28E/1
Maximum data alignment:               1297259249
Database block size:                  0
Blocks per segment of large relation: 0
WAL block size:                       0
Bytes per WAL segment:                0
Maximum length of identifiers:        2
Maximum columns in an index:          100
Maximum size of a TOAST chunk:        0
Date/time type storage:               64-bit integers
Maximum length of locale name:        4
LC_COLLATE:                           
LC_CTYPE:                             

I find the standby says it activated itself:
-----------------------------------------------
 pg_controldata  /var/database/pgsql/tws
WARNING: Calculated CRC checksum does not match value stored in file.
Either the file is corrupt, or it has a different layout than this program
is expecting.  The results below are untrustworthy.

pg_control version number:            903
Catalog version number:               201008051
Database system identifier:           5569584977953909783
Database cluster state:               in production
pg_control last modified:             Wed 09 Feb 2011 08:47:18 AM EST
Latest checkpoint location:           0/1
Prior checkpoint location:            E201221C/1
Latest checkpoint's REDO location:    E1000150/1
Latest checkpoint's TimeLineID:       3791725036
Latest checkpoint's NextXID:          1/0
Latest checkpoint's NextOID:          670
Latest checkpoint's NextMultiXactId:  24579
Latest checkpoint's NextMultiOffset:  1
Time of latest checkpoint:            Wed 31 Dec 1969 07:00:00 PM EST
Minimum recovery ending location:     28E/1
Maximum data alignment:               1297258949
Database block size:                  1
Blocks per segment of large relation: 3791725036
WAL block size:                       0
Bytes per WAL segment:                0
Maximum length of identifiers:        2
Maximum columns in an index:          100
Maximum size of a TOAST chunk:        0
Date/time type storage:               64-bit integers
Maximum length of locale name:        4
LC_COLLATE:                           
LC_CTYPE:                             


the process table on old prod:
LC_CTYPE:                             
-------------------------------
$ ps -ef | grep 30083
500       8950  6052  0 08:50 pts/2    00:00:00 grep 30083
500      30083     1  0 Feb07 ?        00:00:01 /usr/local/pgsql903/bin/postgres -D /var/database/pgsql/tws
500      30084 30083  0 Feb07 ?        00:00:00 postgres: logger process                                   
500      30086 30083  0 Feb07 ?        00:00:02 postgres: writer process                                   
500      30087 30083  0 Feb07 ?        00:00:00 postgres: wal writer process                               
500      30088 30083  0 Feb07 ?        00:00:00 postgres: autovacuum launcher process                      
500      30089 30083  0 Feb07 ?        00:00:06 postgres: stats collector process                          
500      30092 30083  0 Feb07 ?        00:00:07 postgres: wal sender process repuser 198.82.169.39(7908) streaming 1/E20122EC


the processes on the old standby look normal:
----------------------------------------------
$ ps -ef | grep 16990
500       3548 16990  0 Feb07 ?        00:00:13 postgres: wal receiver process   streaming 1/E20122EC      
500      15685 13427  0 08:51 pts/2    00:00:00 grep 16990
500      16990     1  0 Feb04 ?        00:00:00 /usr/local/pgsql903/bin/postgres -D /var/database/pgsql/tws
500      16991 16990  0 Feb04 ?        00:00:00 postgres: logger process                                   
500      16992 16990  0 Feb04 ?        00:00:00 postgres: startup process   recovering 0000000100000001000000E2
500      16993 16990  0 Feb04 ?        00:00:00 postgres: writer process                                   
500      16994 16990  0 Feb04 ?        00:00:00 postgres: stats collector process   


can't do ddl on the "old" standby, the one that says it is "in production"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
tws=#  create table t (x int);
ERROR:  cannot execute CREATE TABLE in a read-only transaction

ddl works on the old prod, the one that says it is "unrecognized status code"




view thread (3+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20110209135548.GA27471@cns.vt.edu>
Permalink:  ../20110209135548.GA27471@cns.vt.edu/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20110209135548.GA27471@cns.vt.edu

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
  Cc: stellr@cns.vt.edu
  Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 9.0.3 streaming replication failure
  In-Reply-To: <20110209135548.GA27471@cns.vt.edu>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox