From: Ray Stell <stellr@cns.vt.edu>
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 9.0.3 streaming replication failure
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 11:25:45 -0500
Message-ID: <20110209162545.GB3529@cns.vt.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110209142818.GA30017@cns.vt.edu>
References: <20110209135548.GA27471@cns.vt.edu>
<20110209142818.GA30017@cns.vt.edu>
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 09:28:18AM -0500, Ray Stell wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 08:55:48AM -0500, Ray Stell wrote:
> my bad, this was a path issue, I was using a v8 pg_controldata cmd.
> the v9 pg_controldata looks good. Sorry.
Come to think about it, could the pg_controldata check the version
and give a warning rather than report corruption?
This is not to excuse my stupor this morning, just a feature idea.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: stellr@cns.vt.edu
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 9.0.3 streaming replication failure
In-Reply-To: <20110209162545.GB3529@cns.vt.edu>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox