pg.ddx.io  pgsql-admin@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>
To: Scott Whitney <scott@journyx.com>
Cc: Mike Christensen <mike@kitchenpc.com>
Cc: Prabhjot Sheena <prabhjot.sheena@rivalwatch.com>
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org <pgsql-admin@postgresql.org>
Cc: Forums postgresql <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] WARNING: database must be vacuumed within 8439472 transactions
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 16:27:18 -0400
Message-ID: <20140707162718.f1d66ba80aaea1d3ef3d5f3e@potentialtech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pbwq0jvbgjg1nw5hnhe18aqe.1404764557197@email.android.com>
References: <pbwq0jvbgjg1nw5hnhe18aqe.1404764557197@email.android.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-general>

On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 15:22:44 -0500 (CDT) Scott Whitney <scott@journyx.com> wrote:

> It does say a FULL vacuum, and that you are not doing.

You're confusing terminology.  VACUUM FULL is not the same as
a "full database vacuum".  The latter is simply expressing that
vacuuming individual tables won't fix the problem.  A VACUUM
FULL is not required.

You really just need to wait it out.  Although at the rate the
number seems to be dropping, you may be in for trouble.

> 
> <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Mike Christensen <mike@kitchenpc.com> </div><div>Date:07/07/2014  3:17 PM  (GMT-06:00) </div><div>To: Prabhjot Sheena <prabhjot.sheena@rivalwatch.com> </div><div>Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org,Forums postgresql <pgsql-general@postgresql.org> </div><div>Subject: Re: [ADMIN] [GENERAL] WARNING: database must be vacuumed within 8439472 transactions </div><div>
> </div>Sounds like you just have to wait until it finishes..
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Prabhjot Sheena <prabhjot.sheena@rivalwatch.com> wrote:
> Hello
>        We are using postgresql 8.3 database for last 5 yrs for this production database and its running fine. This is our critical database which runs 24*7. This weekend we started getting these messages
> 
> HINT:  To avoid a database shutdown, execute a full-database VACUUM.
> WARNING:  database  must be vacuumed within 8439472 transactions
> 
> i am currently running this command
> 
> vacuumdb --analyze db
> 
> while this command is running i m still getting these messages 
> 
> WARNING:  database  must be vacuumed within 2645303 transactions. 
> 
> The value of number of transactions is going down every minute 
> 
> Can anyone tell me what is the best way to sort up this issue. 
> 
> Thanks
> Avi
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general



view thread (20+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20140707162718.f1d66ba80aaea1d3ef3d5f3e@potentialtech.com>
Permalink:  ../20140707162718.f1d66ba80aaea1d3ef3d5f3e@potentialtech.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20140707162718.f1d66ba80aaea1d3ef3d5f3e@potentialtech.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
  Cc: wmoran@potentialtech.com, scott@journyx.com, mike@kitchenpc.com, prabhjot.sheena@rivalwatch.com, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: [ADMIN] WARNING: database must be vacuumed within 8439472 transactions
  In-Reply-To: <20140707162718.f1d66ba80aaea1d3ef3d5f3e@potentialtech.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox