pg.ddx.io pgsql-admin@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feedStatus of the patch "Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics"
3+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]
* Status of the patch "Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics"
@ 2017-11-23 18:45 Debraj Manna <subharaj.manna@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Debraj Manna @ 2017-11-23 18:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-admin
Hi
Can someone let me know if the patches discussed in the below blog
http://akorotkov.github.io/blog/2016/05/09/scalability-towards-millions-tps/
especially the below one has made it to postgres 10 or not? I am not able
to figure out the status of the patch?
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160411214029.ce3fw6zxim5k6a2r@alap3.anarazel.de
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Status of the patch "Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics"
@ 2017-11-23 21:48 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
parent: Debraj Manna <subharaj.manna@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andres Freund @ 2017-11-23 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Debraj Manna <subharaj.manna@gmail.com>; +Cc: pgsql-admin
Hi,
On 2017-11-24 00:15:44 +0530, Debraj Manna wrote:
> Hi
>
> Can someone let me know if the patches discussed in the below blog
>
> http://akorotkov.github.io/blog/2016/05/09/scalability-towards-millions-tps/
>
> especially the below one has made it to postgres 10 or not? I am not able
> to figure out the status of the patch?
It has been applied not just to postgres 10, but also postgres 9.6. See
this note in the release notes:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/release-9-6.html
Replace shared-buffer header spinlocks with atomic operations to improve scalability (Alexander Korotkov, Andres Freund)
Greetings,
Andres Freund
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Status of the patch "Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics"
@ 2017-11-24 05:53 Debraj Manna <subharaj.manna@gmail.com>
parent: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Debraj Manna @ 2017-11-24 05:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>; +Cc: pgsql-admin
Thanks Andres.
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 3:18 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2017-11-24 00:15:44 +0530, Debraj Manna wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Can someone let me know if the patches discussed in the below blog
> >
> > http://akorotkov.github.io/blog/2016/05/09/scalability-
> towards-millions-tps/
> >
> > especially the below one has made it to postgres 10 or not? I am not able
> > to figure out the status of the patch?
>
> It has been applied not just to postgres 10, but also postgres 9.6. See
> this note in the release notes:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/release-9-6.html
> Replace shared-buffer header spinlocks with atomic operations to improve
> scalability (Alexander Korotkov, Andres Freund)
>
> Greetings,
>
> Andres Freund
>
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-11-24 05:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-11-23 18:45 Status of the patch "Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics" Debraj Manna <subharaj.manna@gmail.com>
2017-11-23 21:48 ` Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
2017-11-24 05:53 ` Debraj Manna <subharaj.manna@gmail.com>
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox