From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Debraj Manna <subharaj.manna@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Status of the patch "Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics"
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 13:48:10 -0800
Message-ID: <20171123214810.gbmrgspeurl2b5ry@alap3.anarazel.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF6DVKP782pqQtUxzFaTj092f+2z=UU+nhBLC=y-XNfqm8oZMQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAF6DVKP782pqQtUxzFaTj092f+2z=UU+nhBLC=y-XNfqm8oZMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On 2017-11-24 00:15:44 +0530, Debraj Manna wrote:
> Hi
>
> Can someone let me know if the patches discussed in the below blog
>
> http://akorotkov.github.io/blog/2016/05/09/scalability-towards-millions-tps/
>
> especially the below one has made it to postgres 10 or not? I am not able
> to figure out the status of the patch?
It has been applied not just to postgres 10, but also postgres 9.6. See
this note in the release notes:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/release-9-6.html
Replace shared-buffer header spinlocks with atomic operations to improve scalability (Alexander Korotkov, Andres Freund)
Greetings,
Andres Freund
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: andres@anarazel.de, subharaj.manna@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Status of the patch "Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics"
In-Reply-To: <20171123214810.gbmrgspeurl2b5ry@alap3.anarazel.de>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox