From: RW <postgres@tauceti.net>
To: CG <cgg007@yahoo.com>
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Pg/CyberCluster test results
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 15:52:39 +0200
Message-ID: <48AEC4A7.6050508@tauceti.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <767392.31997.qm@web37902.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <767392.31997.qm@web37902.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
I hoped that it would be easier to get the nodes back in sync
but it seems that all Postgres Multi-Master solutions are not
reliable at the moment. I've planed to test CyberCluster
this weekend but I already suspected that this rsync solutions
have some shortcomings. Sniff...
It seems that we have to wait for PGCluster-II which isn't a
"shared nothing" solution. Instead all files are on a shared
medium like SAN or iSCSI and all instances uses this medium
(similar to Oracle).
Robert
CG wrote:
> I've been testing Cybercluster (which is a modified PgCluster) ... I have two back-end databases, one load balancer, and one replicator. I've been testing failover and rebuilding a degraded cluster, and I'm finidng that it is REALLY easy for the two back-ends to get out of sync with each other. This is very disturbing. I was wondering if anyone has experience with solving this problem.
>
>
>
>
>
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: postgres@tauceti.net, cgg007@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Pg/CyberCluster test results
In-Reply-To: <48AEC4A7.6050508@tauceti.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox