From: Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com>
Subject: Re: List traffic
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 09:21:02 -0500
Message-ID: <4BED15FE0200002500031728@gw.wicourts.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e3e99c85032a806a93a73ea8e5f3b6ab@biglumber.com>
References: <1273790358.8624.3132.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com>
<e3e99c85032a806a93a73ea8e5f3b6ab@biglumber.com>
"Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com> wrote:
> Would anyone argue against rolling those two (sql and admin) into
> -general as a first step?
At the risk of repeating myself, I won't be able to keep up with the
traffic of the combined list; so rather than read 100% of the
messages from a smaller set, I'll need to pick and choose based on
subject line or some such. I get the impression that other people,
who read different subsets of the lists, will be forced to a similar
change. That may result in either some posts "slipping through the
cracks" or in increasing the burden of responding to the posts for
those brave few who wade through them all.
Personally, I'm not convince that merging current lists will solve
more problems than it will create.
-Kevin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, greg@turnstep.com
Subject: Re: List traffic
In-Reply-To: <4BED15FE0200002500031728@gw.wicourts.gov>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox