From: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: List traffic
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 14:10:32 -0000
Message-ID: <e3e99c85032a806a93a73ea8e5f3b6ab@biglumber.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1273790358.8624.3132.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
> There is no reason why advocacy can't happen on general. Theoretically
> www could be on hackers (although I do see the point of a separate
> list).
I don't feel as strong about -advocacy being removed, but we certainly
can fold in -sql and -admin. Would anyone argue against rolling those
two (sql and admin) into -general as a first step?
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201005141009
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iEYEAREDAAYFAkvtWbgACgkQvJuQZxSWSsjfAQCg0s9GxUIKnxHjbAWd2XOWxYpk
OZMAni62Fpj/PPTE9/qFUNw08une4YgT
=OyI0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: greg@turnstep.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: List traffic
In-Reply-To: <e3e99c85032a806a93a73ea8e5f3b6ab@biglumber.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox