From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: List traffic
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 09:51:11 -0700
Message-ID: <4BED7F7F.6000703@agliodbs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e3e99c85032a806a93a73ea8e5f3b6ab@biglumber.com>
References: <e3e99c85032a806a93a73ea8e5f3b6ab@biglumber.com>
>> There is no reason why advocacy can't happen on general. Theoretically
>> www could be on hackers (although I do see the point of a separate
>> list).
First off, this is absolutely the wrong list to be discussing management
of PostgreSQL lists. That belongs on pgsql-www. And, I'll point out,
that this completely pointless discussion on the wrong list has been 1/6
of the traffic on -hackers for the last two days. Also, I really don't
see what problem people think they're addressing with these bimonthly
calls for list consolidation. It seems like a solution in search of a
problem.
So it's an exercise in ironic wankitude. Can we please stop it now?
Second, regarding advocacy: no, absolutely not. -advocacy is a working
list and not a virtual water cooler.
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: josh@agliodbs.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: List traffic
In-Reply-To: <4BED7F7F.6000703@agliodbs.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox