From: Rural Hunter <ruralhunter@gmail.com>
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Grant tables cascade to sequence?
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 13:56:58 +0800
Message-ID: <51552D2A.4090903@gmail.com> (raw)
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-admin>
Hi,
I encounter the same issue often: Granted update/insert to an user but
forgot to grant it on the related sequence. It's hard to understand that
an user has write access on table but not on necessary sequences. I
think the grant on tables should cascade to related sequences. What do
you think?
--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: ruralhunter@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Grant tables cascade to sequence?
In-Reply-To: <51552D2A.4090903@gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox