From: Stephen Cook <sclists@gmail.com>
To: Craig James <cjames@emolecules.com>
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: top posting?
Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 03:37:07 -0400
Message-ID: <5188AF23.9040203@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFwQ8rftO5Z6tMs6pAbfne9noDMGtp7sJfq+rZvJ-BtT5nuw1w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFwQ8rftO5Z6tMs6pAbfne9noDMGtp7sJfq+rZvJ-BtT5nuw1w@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-admin>
On 5/6/2013 2:15 PM, Craig James wrote:
> Just out of curiousity, I see comments like this all the time:
>
> > (*please* stop top-posting).
>
> I've been participating in newsgroups since UUCP days, and I've never
> encountered a group before that encouraged bottom posting. Bottom
> posting has traditionally been considered rude -- it forces readers to
> scroll, often through pages and pages of text, to see a few lines of
> original material.
>
> The most efficient strategy, one that respects other members' time, is
> to briefly summarize your point at the TOP of a posting, then to
> *briefly* quote only the relevant parts of the post to which you are
> replying, and bottom-post after the quoted text. That lets your reader
> quickly see if it's relevant or not, and move on to the next post.
>
> Contributors in these newsgroups seem to think it's OK to quote five
> pages of someone else's response, then add one or two sentences at the
> bottom ... it's just laziness that forces readers to wade through the
> same stuff over and over in each thread.
>
> How did the Postgres newsgroups get started with this "only bottom
> post" idea?
>
> (I'm not trying to start a flame war, just genuinely curious.)
>
> Craig
I always feel good when I see this post, it means I've been following a
mailing list for a (relatively) long time...
It doesn't matter to me at all, I just go with whatever is generally
accepted by the mailing list (or perhaps, whatever is generally accepted
by the most vocal part of the mailing list). Although, I only ever
really did the whole "inline snippets" thing when I'm tearing someone up
in a flame war. Most other replies don't require the precision-quoting.
Currently I'm using Thunderbird, a web page, or various mobile apps to
check my email, and all of them mark the quoted part well enough that I
can skip it and see what is new, or read it knowing full well it is a
quote. Haven't done text-only email for ages, but even back then I
believe there were markings in the margin for what was a quote and what
was new content.
-- Stephen
--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: sclists@gmail.com, cjames@emolecules.com
Subject: Re: top posting?
In-Reply-To: <5188AF23.9040203@gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox