pg.ddx.io  pgsql-admin@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: David F. Skoll <dfs@roaringpenguin.com>
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Opinions on SSDs
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 08:33:04 -0700
Message-ID: <52090030.4000503@commandprompt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130812112833.65a97285@hydrogen.roaringpenguin.com>
References: <20130812112833.65a97285@hydrogen.roaringpenguin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-admin>


On 08/12/2013 08:28 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We run a fairly write-intensive workload and are looking at upgrading
> our Pg servers.  (PostgreSQL 9.1; no practical way to upgrade to 9.2 for
> a while because we use what's packaged with Debian.)

apt.postgresql.org

>
> I'm considering the following configuration:
>
>     Dual 4-core Intel CPU (E5620 at 2.4GHz)
>
>     192GB of RAM
>
>     Sixteen 240GB Intel SSD 520 series drives arranged using Linux
>     RAID-10.  The RAID 10 array will use eight mirrored stripes using the
>     "offset-copies" RAID10 scheme.
>
> Questions:
>
> 1) Has anyone had experience with Intel 520 SSDs?  Are they reliable?
> When they fail, do they fail nicely (ie, failure detected and bad drive
> removed from RAID array) or horribly (data silently corrupted...) ?

I don't recall if the 520s have powerloss protection but you will want 
to check that.

>
> 2) Is this RAID arrangement sensible?  I've seen reports where some
> people keep the pg_xlog directory on a separate RAID array, but I
> don't really see the advantage with SSDs.

Put the pg_xlog on spindles, they are more than fast enough and won't 
eat up the write life of your SSDs.

JD


-- 
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/  509-416-6579
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC, @cmdpromptinc
For my dreams of your image that blossoms
    a rose in the deeps of my heart. - W.B. Yeats


-- 
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin



view thread (11+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <52090030.4000503@commandprompt.com>
Permalink:  ../52090030.4000503@commandprompt.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/52090030.4000503@commandprompt.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
  Cc: jd@commandprompt.com, dfs@roaringpenguin.com
  Subject: Re: Opinions on SSDs
  In-Reply-To: <52090030.4000503@commandprompt.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox