From: Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
To: Martin Badie <martinbadie@yahoo.com>
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: replication with table add/removes..
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 12:28:54 -0600
Message-ID: <dcc563d10810081128i25f9471cv81e8092d4094bd1b@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <103015.29150.qm@web59907.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>
References: <103015.29150.qm@web59907.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Martin Badie <martinbadie@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a system that have constant table adds/removes are present. I want to
> make a replication between master and slaves but not sure which one is the
> best solution for that kind of a situation. Since I am new to replication
> stuff on postgresql I am truly lost but I know that Slony is not an answer
> for replications where table add/remove are present.
I think that pgpool might work for this. There are probably some
other "front end" type replication systems that would work too.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Cc: scott.marlowe@gmail.com, martinbadie@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: replication with table add/removes..
In-Reply-To: <dcc563d10810081128i25f9471cv81e8092d4094bd1b@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox