From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Adam, Etienne (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux) <etienne.adam@nokia.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org, "Duquesne, Pierre (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux)" <pierre.duquesne@nokia.com>
Subject: Re: [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 11:59:14 -0400
Message-ID: <11673.1502467154@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL7LBcYM-32B=n_-h_wPHWiML26UvqP3b_WxD7MgXgOwmxvTFw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL7LBcYM-32B=n_-h_wPHWiML26UvqP3b_WxD7MgXgOwmxvTFw@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-bugs>
"Adam, Etienne (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux)" <etienne.adam@nokia.com> writes:
> ERROR: XX000: unrecognized node type: 90
> LOCATION: ExecReScan, execAmi.c:284
(gdb) p (NodeTag) 90
$1 = T_GatherMergeState
So, apparently somebody wrote ExecReScanGatherMerge, but never bothered
to plug it into ExecReScan. From which we may draw depressing conclusions
about how much it's been tested.
Thanks for the report!
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, etienne.adam@nokia.com, robertmhaas@gmail.com, pierre.duquesne@nokia.com
Subject: Re: [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90
In-Reply-To: <11673.1502467154@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox