pg.ddx.io  pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Adam, Etienne (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux) <etienne.adam@nokia.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org, "Duquesne, Pierre (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux)" <pierre.duquesne@nokia.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 02:52:43 +0000
Message-ID: <20170815025243.GA3986579@rfd.leadboat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11673.1502467154@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <CAL7LBcYM-32B=n_-h_wPHWiML26UvqP3b_WxD7MgXgOwmxvTFw@mail.gmail.com>
	<11673.1502467154@sss.pgh.pa.us>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 11:59:14AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Adam, Etienne (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux)" <etienne.adam@nokia.com> writes:
> > ERROR:  XX000: unrecognized node type: 90
> > LOCATION:  ExecReScan, execAmi.c:284
> 
> (gdb) p (NodeTag) 90
> $1 = T_GatherMergeState
> 
> So, apparently somebody wrote ExecReScanGatherMerge, but never bothered
> to plug it into ExecReScan.  From which we may draw depressing conclusions
> about how much it's been tested.

[Action required within three days.  This is a generic notification.]

The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item.  Robert,
since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
item.  If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a
v10 open item, please let us know.  Otherwise, please observe the policy on
open item ownership[1] and send a status update within three calendar days of
this message.  Include a date for your subsequent status update.  Testers may
discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed
well in advance of shipping v10.  Consequently, I will appreciate your efforts
toward speedy resolution.  Thanks.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers



view thread (44+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20170815025243.GA3986579@rfd.leadboat.com>
Permalink:  ../20170815025243.GA3986579@rfd.leadboat.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20170815025243.GA3986579@rfd.leadboat.com

 · 

reply
Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
  Cc: noah@leadboat.com, robertmhaas@gmail.com, etienne.adam@nokia.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pierre.duquesne@nokia.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90
  In-Reply-To: <20170815025243.GA3986579@rfd.leadboat.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox