From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: marko@joh.to, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Subject: Re: BUG #15888: Bogus "idle in transaction" state for logical decoding client after creating a slot
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 13:51:47 +0900
Message-ID: <20190710045147.GD1031@paquier.xyz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190709214630.GA15632@alvherre.pgsql>
References: <20190709201557.y5yt57z2za2hu6l7@alap3.anarazel.de>
<20190709214630.GA15632@alvherre.pgsql>
On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 05:46:30PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Hmm ... so what that commit did is precisely to fix this bug.
> Magnus thought at the time he was fixing a pg10 bug,
> https://postgr.es/m/CABUevEwX4g8y=gmgfPzxFKS7gqjSYNR949Xc96OQm=YXJmh_Og@mail.gmail.com
> but apparently now we see that the bug was older than that. Maybe it's
> okay to backpatch further?
Yes, I would not be against a back-patch in this case. There is a
minor conflict because pre-9.6 WAL senders cannot run SQL queries but
that looks simple enough to solve.
> (Booh to missing "Discussion:" tags in commit messages)
Booh++
--
Michael
Attachments:
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 832B) download
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Cc: michael@paquier.xyz, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, andres@anarazel.de, magnus@hagander.net
Subject: Re: BUG #15888: Bogus "idle in transaction" state for logical decoding client after creating a slot
In-Reply-To: <20190710045147.GD1031@paquier.xyz>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox